Peer Review History: The Relationships between Shell Length and other Linear Measurements of Dog Conch (Laevistrombus canarium) Collected from the Subtidal Zone of Infanta, Pangasinan, Philippines: A Preliminary Assessment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. P. Dubey, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Balamurugan, Govt Arts College [Autonomous]Thanthonimalai, Bharathidasan University, India.

(2) Hasan Tuaputty, Pattimura University, Indones.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) N. G. Shinde, K. J. Somaiya College, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) S. Thippeswamy, Mangalore University, India.

(3) Yapi jean noel, Universite nangui abrogoua, Côte d’ivoire.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.Balamurugan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hasan Tuaputty, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of Electrophoretic Patterns of Protein Sub Units in Various Tissues of Two Fresh Water Fishes (Heteropneustes fossilis and Labeo rohita) Through Gel Electrophoresis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Misde Yola, Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta II, Indonesia.

(2) Shiv Shankar Singh, Tripura University, India.

(3) T. V. Sankar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Venkateswara Rao, Govt. Degree college, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Misde Yola, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shiv Shankar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T. V. Sankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Screening of Sesame Germplasm against Shoot Webber and Capsule Borer

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Jain, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

(2) Balabadra Keerthana, S V Agricultural College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Roshan Dhakal, USA.

(2) S. Sambathkumar, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Balabadra Keerthana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Helminths in Chickens and Ducks Managed under Backyard System in Imphal West District of Manipur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Ozdal Gokdal, Çine Vocational School, Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Archana P. S, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Science University, India.

(2) Alireza Ghorbani, Urmia University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shagufta Iqbal, University of Kashmir, India.

(2) Muhammad Tahir Sarfraz Khan, University of Brescia, Italy.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Archana P. S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alireza Ghorbani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Dynamics of Phytoplankton Diversity in Ranchi Lake: Indicators of Water Quality and Ecosystem Health

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravikant Singh, Swami Vivekanand University Sagar, India.

(2) Tahir ATICI, Gazi University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dhia Ahmed Taain, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Pawan Kumar, Gaya College, India.

(3) Sumaiya Mohaddis Khatib, G. M. Momin Women’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravikant Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tahir ATICI, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Annona reticulata L. Extract Fortified Mulberry Leaves on Silk Production Parameters of Bombyx mori L.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) M.I. Delighta Mano Joyce, Sadakathullah Appa College, India.

(2) Syeda Fakrunnisa Begum, Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) J. Babila Jasmine, St. Xavier’s college, India.

(2) G. Swathiga, Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) F. Brisca Renuga, Holy Cross College, Manonmaniam Sundaaranar University, India.

(4) H.B. Manjunatha, University of Mysore, India.

(5) Jaywant Shivajirao Dhole, Shikshan Maharshi Dnyandeo Mohekar Mahavidyalya Kallam, India.

(6) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

(7) Kishore S.M, KSNUAHS, India.

(8) H.B. Manjunatha, University of Mysore, India.

(9) K. A. Murugesh, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(10) Ovais Ahmad Hajam, Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India.

(11) Radha M.J, MS Ramaiah College of Arts, India.

(12) Tajamul Islam, Govt. Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.I. Delighta Mano Joyce, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syeda Fakrunnisa Begum, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chronic Kidney Disease in a Dog: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA And Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

(2) Prof. Chen-Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Leong Zi Ping, Malaysia.

(2) Ninan Jacob, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, India.

(3) Bratati Deb Sarkar, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pardeep Sharma, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Leong Zi Ping, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ninan Jacob, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bratati Deb Sarkar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioaccumilation of Heavy Metals in Fish Liza parsia (Hamilton, 1822), from Kayamkulam Estuary

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lokenath Chakraborty, ICAR-Central Inland Fishery Research Institute, India.

(2) Heiam Hamed, Higher Institute of Engineering Technology, Libya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Afaq Talib Farhood, College of science, University of Thi- Qar, Iraq.

(2) Daniela Simina Stefan, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Romania

(3) Otene, Benjamin Bameyi, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(4) Sanjeev Gandhewar, RTM Nagpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lokenath Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Heiam Hamed, Libya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Push-Pull Strategies and Habitat Manipulation for Sustainable Insect Pest Management in Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Serdar DUSEN, Pamukkale University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Nitharwal, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

(2) Ravichandra, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Nitharwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravichandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Geinstein on Regulation of Estrous Cycle in Albino Rats, Isolated from Flemingia vestita, an Ethnomedicinally Important Plant of Meghalaya, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hanis Kusumawati Rahayu, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(2) Varsha Dhurvey, RTM Nagpur University, India.

(3) Pragati Pathak, Jiwaji University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Durgesh Ranjan Kar, BCDA College of Pharmacy & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hanis Kusumawati Rahayu, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Varsha Dhurvey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pragati Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA