Peer Review History: Hepatoprotective Potential of Esculetin Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles (ESC-CNPs) in DMBA- Induced Mammary Carcinogenesis in Sprague-Dawley Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Muthukumar Serva Peddha, CSIR – Central Food technological Research Institute, India.

(2) Shazia Tahira, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adarsh Kumar, GLA University, India.

(2) Ashish Shivram Ramteke, India.

(3) Apt. Kosasih, Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia.

(4) K.R.Padma, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam Women’s University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muthukumar Serva Peddha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shazia Tahira, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal and Spatial Variations of Heavy Metals in the Kollidam River: Implications for Water Quality and Aquatic Health

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State University of Sonora, Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Nirbhay Sudhit Pimple, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Khalid Dheyaa Abdulwahid, University of Diyala, Iraq.

(3) Jephta Mensah Kwakye, Texas A&M University-Commerce, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adem Mohammed Bilale, Wollo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Hossain Al Tanjil, Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany.

(3) Subhashri Priyadarsini, GIET University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nirbhay Sudhit Pimple, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khalid Dheyaa Abdulwahid, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jephta Mensah Kwakye, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of CIDR Treatment in Estrus Synchronization on Insulin Like Growth Factor in Iraqi Ewes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Allah Bux Kachiwal, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(2) Asloob Ahmad Malik, SKUAST, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.H. El-Shahat, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Allah Bux Kachiwal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asloob Ahmad Malik, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Linseed Germplasm against Bud Fly, Dasyneura lini Barnes (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Serdar Dusen, Pamukkale University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(2) Sitesh Chatterjee, Rice Research Station, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sitesh Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An economic and Profitability Comparative Analysis among Different Poultry systems: A Case of Poultry Farmers in Hathazari, Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent Son, Administrative Information Management, Mersin University, Turkey

Reviewers:

(1) Adewale Abidemi AREMU, Federal University of Technology Akure,  Nigeria

(2) Simon Thomas Sebuliba, University of Eswatini, Swaziland

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amusan Elizabeth T, Ajayi Crowther University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adewale Abidemi AREMU, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Simon Thomas Sebuliba, Swaziland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History:

Editor(s):

Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

The peer review history will be available very soon.

Peer Review History: Avian Diversity and Abundance in the Wetlands of Gaya District of Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State University of Sonora, Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Christopher J. Z. Lawlor, Government Kolasib College, India.

(2) Anurag Nashirabadkar, Wildlife Institute of India, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jagruti Rathod, India.

(2) Pournami P, St. Stephen’s College, University of Kerala, India.

(3) Satya Prakash Mehra, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Christopher J. Z. Lawlor, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anurag Nashirabadkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Enigmatic Journey of Black Soldier Fly: Revolutionizing Solid Waste Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. P. Dubey, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Julieta Sánchez Velázquez, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, México.

(2) Prerna Mehta, GD Rungta College of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Julieta Sánchez Velázquez, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prerna Mehta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth and Production of Desi Magur (Clarius batrachus) under Fresh Water Biofloc System

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) V R Thakur, India.

(2) Prashant Prabhakar Ingale, Saibaba Arts and Science College, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V R Thakur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prashant Prabhakar Ingale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Recent Innovations in Sericulture: A Comprehensive Review of Advancements in Silk Production and Quality Enhancement

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi Degree College, India.

(2) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) M.Mithilasri, Anna University, India.

(2) Iqra Rafiq, SKUAST-K, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rashtrarakshak, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.Mithilasri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iqra Rafiq,  India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA