Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University Of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Neha Gosai, India.

(2) Ibrahim, Umar Augie, Federal University Teaching Hospital, Birnin-Kebbi, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neha Gosai, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ibrahim, Umar Augie, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Samson Ehindero Olorunnado, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.

(2) Sara Mostafa Kamal, Egyptian Chinese University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Fernández Abella, University of Uruguay, Uruguay.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samson Ehindero Olorunnado, Rwanda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sara Mostafa Kamal, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Sharmila Banu, N.K.R. Government Arts College for Women, India.

(2) Ampili M, Nss College, University of Kerala, India.

(3) Devajit Basumatari, Cotton University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Devajit Basumatari, Cotton University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.97/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Sharmila Banu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ampili M, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Devajit Basumatari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Asli Şalcioglu, Turkiye.

(2) Matysyagandha Kishanrao Patil, COVAS, Udgir, MAFSU, India.

(3) Maab I. AL-Farwachi, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil Kumar, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Rajesh Kumar, Bihar Veterinary College Patna, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asli Şalcioglu, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Matysyagandha Kishanrao Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maab I. AL-Farwachi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Wiwat Rojanapithayakorn, Mahidol University, Thailand.

(2) Amina Gambo Umar, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Nigeria.

(3) Eshetu Dadi Gurmu, Adama Science and Technology University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.36/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wiwat Rojanapithayakorn, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amina Gambo Umar, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eshetu Dadi Gurmu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Araya Mengistu Kassa, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

(2) Fernando Condal Domingo, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Araya Mengistu Kassa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fernando Condal Domingo, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Angelo Mark P. Walag, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Peredy Khwesa, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

(2) Nasser Keikha, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Peredy Khwesa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nasser Keikha, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Michael Debrah, Texas A&M University, United States of America.

(2) Rasha Mohamed Ali Gharieb, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Michael Debrah, United States of America) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rasha Mohamed Ali Gharieb, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Institute of Water Modelling (IWM), Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) F.X. Susilo, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Aakash Adhikari, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joseph Ekenwosu, Imo State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (F.X. Susilo, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aakash Adhikari, Germany) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 1

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Clinical Biochemistry, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Torill Sauer, University of Oslo, Norway.

(2) Nicolae Bacalbasa, Carol Davila University, Romania.

(3) Chittepu Obulareddy, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Torill Sauer, Norway) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nicolae Bacalbasa, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chittepu Obulareddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA