Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Chandola, DBS PG College, India.

(2) R. Abdul Vahith, Jamal Mohamed College, India.

(3) Kasamba Ilunga Eric, University of Lubumbashi, DR Congo.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Chandola, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Abdul Vahith, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kasamba Ilunga Eric, DR Congo) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Angelo Mark P. Walag, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Jada Naga Lakshmi, Vignan Pharmacy college, India.

(2) Seniuk Igor, National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jada Naga Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seniuk Igor, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Angelo Mark P. Walag, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Mikaela I Poling, United States of America.

(2) M.R.Rajan, The Gandhigram Rural Institute- Deemed to be University Gandhigram, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mikaela I Poling, United States of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M.R.Rajan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Professor, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Anita Puspa Widiyana, Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia.

(2) Vijay Singh, India.

(3) Zaineb Abdelkafi, Salah Azaiez Institute of Cancer, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anita Puspa Widiyana, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vijay Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zaineb Abdelkafi, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) H Anwer Basha, Saveetha College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, SIMATS University, India.

(2) Jocelyn Obido Pattuinan, Philippine Science High School – Central Mindanao Campus, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (H Anwer Basha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jocelyn Obido Pattuinan, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar Ramadi, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Delara Sepehrfar, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

(2) Maina Kumari, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Delara Sepehrfar, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maina Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Professor, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Medidi Srinivas, Geethanjali College of Pharmacy, Hyderabad, India.

(2) Tataringa Gabriela, UMF Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Medidi Srinivas, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tataringa Gabriela, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Professor, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mosiqur Rahman, Southeast University, Bangladesh.

(2) Samer Saleem Alshkarchy, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(3) Benjamin Valladares Carranza, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico Toluca, México.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mosiqur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samer Saleem Alshkarchy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Benjamin Valladares Carranza, México) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Harpreet Kaur Sodhi, Army College of Nursing, India.

(2) Horia Bunescu, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harpreet Kaur Sodhi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Horia Bunescu, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Yosiel Álvarez Quesada, Institute of Ecology and Systematics (IES), Cuba.

(2) Pollobi Duara, Majuli College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yosiel Álvarez Quesada, Cuba) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pollobi Duara, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA