Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University Of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Jordan Tembo, Chipata Central Hospital, Zambia.

(2) Ahmed Shamkhi Jabbar, AL-Muthanna University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jordan Tembo, Zambia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Shamkhi Jabbar, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Mouslim Bara, University 8 mai 1945 Guelma, Algeria.

(2) Belayneh Ayechw, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/1

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mouslim Bara, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Belayneh Ayechw, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Jiji Varghese, Christian College, India.

(2) Jefferson Luiz Jeronimo, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Santa Catarina – IFSC, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jiji Varghese, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jefferson Luiz Jeronimo, Brasil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Thakur, India.

(2) Attivi Komi, Université de lomé , Togo.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Thakur, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Attivi Komi, Togo) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Emine Incilay Torunoğlu, Necmettin Erbakan University, Türkiye.

(2) Chakresh Patley, Gracious College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Eli Zughumnaan Well, Benue State University Makurdi, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emine Incilay Torunoğlu, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chakresh Patley, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eli Zughumnaan Well, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Laurenţiu Tudor, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Debayan Gayen, Durgapur Government College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Laurenţiu Tudor, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debayan Gayen, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Fajar Shodiq Permata, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.

(2) P.A.Enbavelan, Veterinary College and Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fajar Shodiq Permata, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P.A.Enbavelan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Majid Esmaelizad, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Iran.

(2) Mohammad Velayatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Majid Esmaelizad, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Velayatzadeh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Tambe Ram Shivaji, Savaitribai Pune Uniiversity, Pune Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

(2) K. Jayamoorthy, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tambe Ram Shivaji, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Jayamoorthy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA