Peer Review History: Efficacy of Bioagents and Botanicals for the Management of Banana Pseudostem Weevil, Odoiporus longicollis Olivier (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Seyma Yigit Bas, Turkey.

(2) Mukesh Nitharwal, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

(3) Lalit Gupta, Janta College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anatolii Semenov, Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Poltava State Agrarian University, Ukraine.

(2) Ioana Stanciu, University of Bucharest, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seyma Yigit Bas, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mukesh Nitharwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lalit Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Otters of India: Conservation Challenges and Veterinary Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Huma Ashfaq, Pakistan.

(2) Chiranjeev Pandey, Hemchand Yadav University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aqeelah Ali Al-Abdly, University of Benghazi, Libya.

(2) Titiloye Tayo Oluwaseyi, The Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Zeina Nabil Ll Azawi, Baghdad college Ibn Al Haitham, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Huma Ashfaq, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chiranjeev Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Sustainable Livestock Feed Solution during Drought: Sugarcane Silage with Additives

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Belisario Dominguez-Mancera, University Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Mohapatra, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Egypt.

(3) Amitava Roy, West Bengal University of Animal & Fishery Sciences (WBUAFS), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Opuogulaya Richard, Kennule Beeson Saro-Wiwa Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:.

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Kumar Mohapatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sarhan Ahmed Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amitava Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Annotated Checklist of Shrimp Diversity of Machilipatnam Coast, Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Bimbisar Dayanand Waghmare, Netaji Subhashchandra Bose Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

(2) Joaquin Macias Sancho, Federal University of Rio Grande,  Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bimbisar Dayanand Waghmare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joaquin Macias Sancho, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Population Dynamics of Pests Infesting Guava in Relation to Weather Parameters in Southern Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep V, India.

(2) Manas Paramanik, Kazi Nazrul University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandeep V, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manas Paramanik, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bubble Test: A Prognostic Indicator to Identify the Lung Maturity in Neonatal Pups

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ebrahim Abbasi, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Junaid Aslam, National University of Medical Sciences, Pakistan.

(3) Bamigbade Bukky Onyemowo, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Al-Sayed R Al-Attar, University of Tripoli, Libya.

(2) Alyaa fadhil saeed, University of Kufa, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ebrahim Abbasi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Junaid Aslam, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bamigbade Bukky Onyemowo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Long-Term Assessment of Avian Diversity in a Wetland Ecosystem Using Alpha and Beta Diversity Indices

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa,Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Kosisochukwu Onyeagba, University of Cincinnati, USA.

(2) Rupam Sinha, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nikeet Pradhan, Agriculture and Forestry University, Nepal.

(2) Nsor Charles Ayuk, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

(3) Pere-Ere Sarah Tobia, Bayelsa Medical University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kosisochukwu Onyeagba, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rupam Sinha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Plant Extracts and Natural Compounds in Plant Disease Control: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ram Krishan, Government Degree College Kathua (J&K), India.

(2) Hanadi Abdulelah Abdulrazzaq, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Samiran Patra, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ram Krishan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanadi Abdulelah Abdulrazzaq, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antibacterial Activity of Perionyx Excavatus Coelomic Fluid and Ethanolic Body Extract Against Escherichia coli and Gc-Ms Profiling of the Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mihir Otia, University Of East London, United Kingdom.

(2) Hussein L. Algboory, Iraq.

(3) Kiran Mahajan , Sharadchandra Pawar College of Pharmacy , India.

(4) Sisitha Ramachandra, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhushan Pramodrao Bhusare, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Deepak Kumar, GPGC Bazpur, India.

(3) Nirav Soni, Gujarat Technological University (GTU), India.

(4) Santanu Gupta, Malda College, India.

(5) Zahraa Isam Jameel, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mihir Otia, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hussein L. Algboory, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kiran Mahajan , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sisitha Ramachandra, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation and Nutritional Evaluation of Fruit-Waste–Based Fish Feeds for Sustainable Aquaculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

(2) Nuttaporn Chanchay, Maejo University Phrae Campus, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kayode Dada, University Library, Federal University of Education, Zaria, Nigeria.

(2) Ramdas R.Kamdi, Anand Niketan College Anandwan Warora, Gondwana University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nuttaporn Chanchay, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA