Peer Review History: Occurrence of Salmonella spp. in Raw Chicken and Immediate Slaughter Environments from Unorganised Poultry Houses in Kashmir, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Martin Zang Pam, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Vom, Nigeria.

(2) G. Kondaiah, Yogi Vemana University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aini, Universitas Bima International MFH, Indonesia.

(2) Andrijanto Hauferson Angi, State Agricultural Polytechnic of Kupang, Indonesia.

(3) Hassan Khuder Rajab Abdullah, Tikrit University, Iraq.

(4) Noura Fathy Mahmoud Mostafa, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(5) Omid Koohkan, Chabahar Maritime University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Martin Zang Pam, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Kondaiah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Wavelength-Dependent LED Phototoxicity and Morphometric Outcomes in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Larvae: A Comparative Assessment at 5 and 10 Days Post-Fertilisation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Giri, SAGE University, Bhopal, India.

(2) Anil Savji Kotiya, Kamdhenu University, Gandhinagar, India.

(3) Iman Darwish, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christiana Nkuturum, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Yevheniia Babenko, V.M. Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukrain, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Giri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil Savji Kotiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Iman Darwish, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biological and Ontogenic Studies of Brinjal Shoot and Fruit Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenée) under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Kareem Al-Taae, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Waluniba, Nagaland University, India.

(3) M.Ananthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) João Rufino de Freitas Filho, Rural Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Kareem Al-Taae, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Waluniba, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M.Ananthi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Trust Paradox in Green Nudges in the Indian Context: Mediating the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Interventions with Socio-Cultural Sensitivity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, AKTU Lucknow University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Renil Septiano, Indonesia.

(2) Ranjith Somasundaran Chakkambath, Amity , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shivam Singh, IIT Delhi, India.

(2) Slavoljub Jaroslav Hilčenko, Univesity of Novi Sad, College for Vocational Education of Preschool Teachers and Coaches, Serbia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Renil Septiano, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjith Somasundaran Chakkambath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Variation in the Proximate Composition of Mugil cephalus from the Godavari Estuary, Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Ghaffar, Ocean University of China, Pakistan.

(2) Divya Kiran Kokani, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Kumar Singh, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Ghaffar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Divya Kiran Kokani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of FSH Stimulation on Follicular Development and Oocyte Recovery Rate Following Ovum Pick-up in Sahiwal Cows

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Agung Adi Candra, Politeknik Negeri Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Manoj Kumar Sharma, CSKHPKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dibyendu Chakraborty, SKUAST-Jammu, India.

(2) Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, COVAS, India.

(3) Shivani Jha, ICAR National Research Centre for Makhana, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agung Adi Candra, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Varietal Screening of Rose Cultivars against Sucking Pests under Field Conditions in the Kashmir Valley

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India.

(2) Alaa Sadoon Abbas, AL-Furat Al-Awset Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Ragni Devi, ANDUAT Kumarganj, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alaa Sadoon Abbas, AL-Furat Al-Awset Technical University, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ragni Devi, ANDUAT Kumarganj, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Biochemical Composition of Muscle Tissue of Freshwater Fish Channa striata (Bloch) of River Kharun, Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Vardhanapu Venkata Lakshmi, Tamil Nadu Dr. J Jayalithaa Fisheries University, India.

(2) Murwanashyaka Miche, Kibogora Polytechnic, Rwanda.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vardhanapu Venkata Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Murwanashyaka Miche, Rwanda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Zooplankton in Active and Non-active Fishing Zones of Kollam, Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Aquaculture, Atatürk University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Fereidun Mohebbi, Education and Extension Organization, Urmia, Iran.

(2) R Rajendar Kumar, MBRC, Zoological Survey of India Chennai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farhana Shafiq Ghory, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(2) Monika Dudić, State university of Novi Pazar, Serbia.

(3) Prachi Sachchidanand Hatkar, DES Pune University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fereidun Mohebbi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R Rajendar Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Poecilobdella manashiae, A New Species of Leech from Tripura, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. P. Dubey, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Saiprasad Bhusare, Dau Shri Vasudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Sagrado C. Magallanes, Romblon State University, Philippines.

(3) Naveen Kumar, anskaram University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saiprasad Bhusare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sagrado C. Magallanes, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Naveen Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA