Author Archive: mbimph

Peer Review History: The Effect of Triclosan in Endocrine and Reproductive Disruption: A Comprehensive Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) SB Sainath, Vikrama Simhapuri University, India.

(2) Mohammad Aziz, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (SB Sainath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Aziz, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Insights into Apicomplexan Parasites: Exploring Diversity in Insects of Economic Importance

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ebormi S.  Langshiang, NEHU, India.

(2) Swapna.S, SN College, University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prakash Kumar, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ebormi S.  Langshiang, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swapna.S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Study of the Hydroclimatic Information Needs of Rural Farmers in Aba Agricultural Zone of Abia State, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Harshil Patel, School of Sciences, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Durdanah Mattoo, University of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zbiri Asmae, University Mohammed V, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harshil Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Durdanah Mattoo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Study the Effect of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles on Corneal Injury Healing in Rabbits

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Ashok Bhagwat, Samarth College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Farnaz Sadat Fattahi, IUT, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Kumar, Rama University Mandhana Kanpur, India.

(2) B. R. Pandey, India.

(3) Martha Orendu Oche Attah, Cyprus International University, Cyprus.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajay Ashok Bhagwat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farnaz Sadat Fattahi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Population, Time Activity Budget and Habitat Utilization of Nilgiri Langur (Semnopithecus johnii) in Nilgiri Forest Division, Tamil Nadu, Southern India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora, Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Tej Kumar Nepal, Bhutan.

(2) Ronglarp Sukmasuang, Kasetsart University, Thailand.

(3) Arnau Llovera Mascorda, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kezang Wangchuk, Bhutan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tej Kumar Nepal, Bhutan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ronglarp Sukmasuang, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arnau Llovera Mascorda, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of Physico-Chemical Parameters and Zooplankton Diversity in the Panjapur Lake, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, South India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Naveen Kumar, Raffles University, India.

(2) Abhishek Giri, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

(3) Tausif Haseeb Khan, Guru Nanak Khalsa College of Arts , Science And Commerce (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aswathy Vijaya Krishna, Space Applications Centre (ISRO), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naveen Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Giri, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tausif Haseeb Khan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Consequences of Toxic Heavy Metals on Environment and Human Health: A Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nanu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ifreke Mfon Udofia, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

(2) Swati Singh Chandel, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akanksha Behl, Noida International University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ifreke Mfon Udofia, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swati Singh Chandel, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Ecological Diversity of Marine Copepods of Mandapam Region, Southeast Coast of India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Phuttaphannee Boonmak, Rajabhat Roi Et University, Thailand.

(2) Radhika R, NSS Hindu College, India.

(3) Prabir Sahoo, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Punit Saraswat, Lachoo Memorial College Of Science And Technology (AUTONOMOUS), India.

(2) Ifie-emi Francis Oseke, Federal University Otuoke, Nigeria.

(3) Rezvan Mousavi-Nadushan, Islamic Azad University, Tehran North Branch, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Phuttaphannee Boonmak, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radhika R, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prabir Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Recent Advances in Tick Vaccine Development and Future Prospects

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

(2) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Kosisochukwu Dematus Onyeagba, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(2) Hasanain A.J. Gharban, University of Wasit, Iraq.

(3) Nazir Ahmad Tookhy, Herat University, Afghanistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Tiwari, DUVASU Veterinary University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kosisochukwu Dematus Onyeagba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hasanain A.J. Gharban, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nazir Ahmad Tookhy, Afghanistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Sustainable Utilization of Biodiversity: Legal Perspectives on Human Welfare and Intellectual Property

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Suruliyandi Vijayan, Anna University Campus, India.

(2) Chiranjeev Pandey, Government Digvijay Autonomous P.G. College, India.

(3) Danjuma John, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.R.Rajan, The Gandhigram Rural Institute- Deemed To Be University, India.

(2)Samuel Humphrey Sam, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chiranjeev Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Danjuma John, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA