Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Ozdal Gokdal, Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehrdad Zamanpoore, Iran.

(2) Chiranjeev Pandey, Govt. Digivijay Auto PG College Rajnandgaon CG, India.

(3) Binal Rajeshbhai Khalasi, College of Fisheries Mangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehrdad Zamanpoore, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chiranjeev Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Binal Rajeshbhai Khalasi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ridha Alamsyah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sinjai, Indonesia.

(2) Amrita Dutta Nayak, Ranchi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ridha Alamsyah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amrita Dutta Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno,National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

(2) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Aslam, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) Samudrapu. Sanjay Raj, CSKHPKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Aslam, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samudrapu. Sanjay Raj, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Jhakeshwar Prasad, Shri Shankaracharya College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tasawar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jhakeshwar Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Naila Ghafoor, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Sachu Philip, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naila Ghafoor, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sachu Philip, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Veronica Kadam, College of Horticulture, India.

(2) Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, State University of Rio Grande do Sul – Vacaria , Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Veronica Kadam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Lamis Mohamed Nader Saad, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Milan M. Chudasama, KAMDHENU UNIVERSITY, India.

(3) Rudy C. Flores, Bataan Peninsula State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lamis Mohamed Nader Saad, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Milan M. Chudasama, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rudy C. Flores, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sirigireddy Sivajothi, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bimbisar Dayanand Waghmare, Netaji Subhashchandra Bose Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

(2) Jefferson Duldulao Gagelonia, Central Luzon State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bimbisar Dayanand Waghmare, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jefferson Duldulao Gagelonia, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sirigireddy Sivajothi, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pollobi Duara, Majuli College , India.

(2) G. Swathi, Government Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pollobi Duara, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Swathi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho , University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar Kashyap , Dau Shri Vashudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalya, India.

(2) Muhammad Bin Mohd Sabri, Malaysian Agriculture Research and Development Institute, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Kumar Kashyap, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Bin Mohd Sabri, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA