Peer Review History: Enzymological Effects of Lead Acetate Exposure in Various Organs of Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters 1852)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Rick Jhan P. Hiponia, Himamaylan National High School, Philippines.

(2) Hagar Sedeek Dighiesh, Suez University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lamiaa Tarek Mostafa Mahmoud Elmatary , National institute of oceanography and fisheries (NIOF), Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rick Jhan P. Hiponia, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hagar Sedeek Dighiesh, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Nematodes Menace: A Review of Parasitic Species, Transmission Dynamics and Preventive Measures

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Qazi Majaz Ahamad, Ali Allana College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) B. Puvarajan, TANUVAS, India.

(3) Alireza Ghorbani, Urmia University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qazi Majaz Ahamad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Puvarajan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alireza Ghorbani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of Heavy Metal Accumulation on Agricultural Soils and Its Mitigation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Fariha Jabeen, Abdul Wali Khan University, Pakistan.

(2) Birhanu Mekassa Wolde, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adem Mohammed Bilale, Wollo University, Ethiopia.

(2) R. S. S. Srikanth Vemuri, Vignan’s Institute of Engineering for Women, India.

(3) Somanath Sarvade, Jawaharlal Nehru Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fariha Jabeen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Birhanu Mekassa Wolde, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Formaldehyde-Treated Feed on Rumen Metabolism and Blood Biochemistry in Lambs: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bogdan Cekic, Institute for Animal Husbandry, Serbia.

(2) Ramesh Padodara, College of Veterinary Science & AH, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Luis Remedios Hernández, Cuba.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bogdan Cekic, Serbia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramesh Padodara, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In silico Docking Studies between Atorvastatin and Human Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Facilitating the Conversion of Triglycerides Found in VLDL into Cholesterol Esters Found in HDL of Pan troglodytes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Vaidehi, DDGDVC, India.

(2) Marvel Reuben Suwitono, Universitas Advent Indonesia, Indonesia.

(3) Hetalkumar Panchal, Sardar Patel University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Neamah Ayyash, College Of Applied Science, University Of Fallujah, Iraq.

(2) A.Priyadharshini, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Vaidehi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marvel Reuben Suwitono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hetalkumar Panchal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Implications of Coalfield Dynamics on Associated Ecosystems: A Tangential Review

Editor(s):

(1)Prof. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State University of Sonora, Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Chellat Smaine, University of Constantine1, Algeria.

(2) Ajay Kumar, Manipal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chellat Smaine, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Socio-economic Dynamics and Willingness to Pay for Improved Ecosystem: A Study of Coastal Communities of Korapuzha Estuary, Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University Of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Rinnie Mahajan, University of Jammu, India.

(2) Daudi Bigirwa, University of Dodoma, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Medielyn m. Odtojan, Surigao Del Norte State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rinnie Mahajan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daudi Bigirwa, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Micro and Macro Nutrient Analysis on Vermicomposting Properties of Native Indian Lampito mauritii

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanuel Tetteh-Doku Mensah, Research Scientist, CSIR-Water Research Institute, Aquaculture Research and Development Centre, Ghana.

Reviewers:

(1) Tambe Ram Shivaji, SPPUP, Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

(2) S. Umamaheswari, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shweta Yadav, Dr Harisingh Gour Central University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tambe Ram Shivaji, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Umamaheswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Navigating Challenges and Opportunities in Russian Logistics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Levent Son, Professor, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sukhamaya Swain, JK Business School, India.

(2) Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania.

(3) Zafrul Allam, University of Bahrain, Bahrain.

(4) Brij Behari Dave, IIMB, India.

(5) Dickson Mdhlalose, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sukhamaya Swain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zafrul Allam, Bahrain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Brij Behari Dave, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Dickson Mdhlalose, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_5_v1 (Dickson Mdhlalose, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Lactobacillus Probiotic Supplement on Growth and Haematological Performance of Indian Major Carp Labeo rohita

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejpal Dahiya, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) S. Jayaparakash, Vivekanadha College of Arts and Science for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tejpal Dahiya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Jayaparakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA