Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ouassila Riouchi, Mohammed 1st University, Morocco.

(2) Renuka Vijayakumar, ICAR-CIFT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ouassila Riouchi, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Renuka Vijayakumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jenan Mahdi Jawad AL-Kawaz, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Gowtham K, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dharmendra Kumar, Govt. P. G. College Maldevta (Raipur), India.

(2) Venkateswara Rao Mandalapu, Kakatiya University. Warangal. Govt. Degree College Yellandu, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jenan Mahdi Jawad AL-Kawaz, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gowtham K, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Adham Soufi, Tishreen University, Syria.

(2) Vishal Rajput, Swami Rama Himalayan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nada Khazal K. Hindi, Al-Mustaqbal university, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Adham Soufi, Syria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vishal Rajput, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Antonina Sydorenko, Poltava State Medical University, Ukraine.

(2) Dwivedi Namrata, M.G.C.G.V., India.

(3) Gunji Venkateswarlu, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Furqan Mohammed, Al-Naji University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Antonina Sydorenko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dwivedi Namrata, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gunji Venkateswarlu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen-Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) M.Ananthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Sharvan Kumar, Invertis University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.Ananthi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sharvan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Palanivel, Imayam Institute of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Srinivasulu Reddy Motireddy, Sri Venkateswara University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rigoberto Alarcon Rojas, Universidad Politecnica Territorial De Merida “Kleber Ramirez” (UPTMKR), Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Palanivel, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Srinivasulu Reddy Motireddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) G.Kalaiselvi, TANUVAS, India.

(2) Mykola Zhelavskyi, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.Karthika, TANUVAS, VCRI, India.

(2) Mykola Zhelavskyi, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G.Kalaiselvi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mykola Zhelavskyi, Ukraine) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gokul Krishna Dhanapati, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Ali Ammar, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gokul Krishna Dhanapati, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Ammar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankush Sharma, Sri Sai University, India.

(2) Reham Fathey Ali Mohamed, Heliopolis University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Murali, St.Joseph University, India.

(2) Bhasker Shenoy, Mangalore University, India.

(3) Owoidihe Monday Etukudo, Topfaith University, Nigeria.

(4) Paulo Ricardo Silva Coelho, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankush Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Reham Fathey Ali Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamal Singh, Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences (RMRIMS), India.

(2) Pravas Ranjan Sahoo, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pon.Arun, King Institute of Preventive Medicine & Research, India.

(2) Praful Bambharoliya, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamal Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pravas Ranjan Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA