Peer Review History: Aluminium Toxicity Affects Different Organisms: A Mini Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Belisario Dominguez-Mancera, University Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sampa Baidya, College of Fisheries, India.

(2) Anas Islam, GLA University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Sharma, Central Forensic Science Laboratory (Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India), India.

(2) Sujal K. Revankar, Karnatak University Post Graduate Centre Karwar, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sampa Baidya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anas Islam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Attraction of Rhyssomatus nigerrimus (Fahraeus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to Odors from Alternate Host Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Om Singh, ICAR-IVRI Deemed University, India.

(2) B. Thirupam Reddy, India.

(3) Kapilya Gangadharan, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anup Chandra, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, India.

(2) Gagan Preet Kour Bali, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Om Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Thirupam Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kapilya Gangadharan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study on Clinical Manifestations Associated with Various Fore-stomach Disorders in Buffaloes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Albino N. Ter, Surigao del Norte State University, Mainit Campus, Philippines.

(2) Rajat Buragohain, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Albino N. Ter, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajat Buragohain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Mangroves as Fishery Resource: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oğuzhan Yildiz, Associate Professor, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarifah Aini, Pukyong National University, Republic of Korea.

(2) Akueson Adoté Hervé  Gildas, Benin.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarifah Aini, Republic of Korea) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akueson Adoté Hervé Gildas, Benin) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: First Record of Genus Melancistrus Graham (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) with Description of a New Species from India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Layla Omran Elmajdoub, Assistant Professor, Misurata University, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) Santiago Niño Maldonado, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, México.

(2) Diepiriye Chenaboso Okujagu, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(3) Biplab Kumar Das, Jengraimukh College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M. Prasanna Rajeshkumar, K.S. Rangasamy College of Arts and Science (Autonomous), India.

(2) Rakesh Kumar, Maharishi Markandeshwar (DU), India.

(3) Uma Rani Agrawal, University of Allahabad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Santiago Niño Maldonado, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Diepiriye Chenaboso Okujagu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Biplab Kumar Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Anti-cancer Properties of Bio -fabricated Copper-silver-zinc Nanocomposites: An Ecofriendly Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Farnaz Sadat Fattahi, AUT, Iran.

(2)MohammadHossein Karami, Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran.

(3) Rian Oktiansyah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Farnaz Sadat Fattahi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (MohammadHossein Karami, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rian Oktiansyah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Phyllanthus niruri on the Escherichia coli Infected Silkworm, Bombyx mori L.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Damiana Rita Ekastuti, IPB University, Indonesia.

(2) Pradeep Kumar Mishra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Damiana Rita Ekastuti, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradeep Kumar Mishra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Validation of Advanced Backcross-derived Rice Lines for Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) Resistance via SSR Markers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Alieu Mohamed Bah, Njala University, Sierra Leone.

(2) Nanda C, ICAR-CTRI Research Station, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alieu Mohamed Bah, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nanda C, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Idol Immersion on Mumbai’s Aquatic Ecosystems: Comparative Analysis of Juhu Beach, Marve Beach, and Dingeshwar Lake, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandni Upadhyaya, Shree P. M. Patel Institute of Integrated M. Sc. In Biotechnology, India.

(2) Heike Lucht, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandni Upadhyaya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Heike Lucht, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diversity and Relative Abundance of Insect Pests and Natural Enemies in Organic Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) R.N.V.Jagan Mohan, Sagi Rama Krishnam Raju Engineering College, India.

(2) Mario Giambiasi, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay.

(3) Mandeep Rathee, Krishi Vigyan Kendra Kaithal, CCSHAU, India.

(4) Madhusudan S, Maharani’s Science College, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R.N.V.Jagan Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mario Giambiasi, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mandeep Rathee, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Madhusudan S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA