Peer Review History: Length-weight Relationship of Male and Female Sperata seenghala from River Gomti and River Saryu in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Denny Arbahri, Indonesia.

(2) Nasrullah Rastegar-Pouyani, Razi University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Denny Arbahri, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nasrullah Rastegar-Pouyani, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Aquatic Landscape Health Using Brachyuran Crab Habitats in the Chennai Coastal Region: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dante M. Mendoza, Pampanga State Agricultural University, Philippines.

(2) Menakshi Dhar, University of Jammu, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dante M. Mendoza, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Menakshi Dhar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on the Status of Genetic Characterization of Indigenous Goat Breeds in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Agata Anna Danielewicz, Institute of Animal Science and Fisheries, University in Siedlce, Poland.

(2) Hannah Edim Etta, University of Cross River State, Nigeria.

(3) Serdar Genç, Kirsehir Ahi Evran, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Mohammed Saadi, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Samad sheikh, Icar- central institute of fisheries education, Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agata Anna Danielewicz, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hannah Edim Etta, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Serdar Genç, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Efficacy of Different Bio-Enzyme on Acidic Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Belisario Dominguez-Mancera, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Praduman Tyagi, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Amelie L. Chico, Um Panabo College, Philippines.

(3) Kolimigundla Amarnath, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Praduman Tyagi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amelie L. Chico, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kolimigundla Amarnath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dietary Supplementation of Grape (Vitis vinifera) Seed Powder in Broiler Chicken

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

(2) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Bamigboye Samson. O, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(2) Binod Pokhrel, School of Animal Sciences, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bamigboye Samson. O, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Binod Pokhrel, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Multi-Biomarker Approach in Assessing the Growth and Physiological Stress in Pangasianodon hypophthalmus under Acute Ammonia Exposure

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Theophilus Apenuvor, Jasikan College of Education, Ghana.

(2) Olalekan Paul Akande, Institute of Export Operations & Management, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suraj Satish Kolhe, Dayanand Science College, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Theophilus Apenuvor, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olalekan Paul Akande, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management Strategies for Mitigating Winter Box Jellyfish Bloom’s Impact on Pancham Aquaculture Shrimp Farm, Palghar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) José Luis Gómez Márquez, UNAM, Mexico.

(2) Mohd Khairi Ismail, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (José Luis Gómez Márquez, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd Khairi Ismail, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marine Benthic Diversity of the Gulf of Kutch, Gujarat: A review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Angelo Mark P. Walag, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Institute of Water Modelling (IWM), Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Agus Sabdono, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

(2) M. Ramasamy, A.V.V.M. Sri Pushpam College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agus Sabdono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Ramasamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence of Onion Thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman in Gird Region of Madhya Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Khamar, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco.

(2) Mingzeng Sun, USA.

(3) José Oliveira Dantas, Instituto de Educação, Ciências e Tecnologias de Sergipe, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Khamar, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mingzeng Sun, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (José Oliveira Dantas, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation and Identification of Vibrio sp. from Marine Fishes of Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Institute of Water Modelling (IWM), Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Omer Fayshal Pavel, East West University, Bangladesh.

(2) Divya C, Kerala Veterinary & Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adib SAAD, Syria.

(2) Shaymaa Abdul Hadi Kadhim Almansoori, Babylon university, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omer Fayshal Pavel, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Divya C, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA