Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Angelinus Vincentius, Nusa Nipa University, Indonesia.

(2) Deepti Tomar, PMCOE, Govt. College, India.

(3) Sushil Bera, Khejuri College, India.

(4) Ahmed Chasib AL-Shamary, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G.Swathi, Government Degree College (A), Nagari, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Angelinus Vincentius, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepti Tomar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sushil Bera, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ahmed Chasib AL-Shamary, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) J. Sukanya M.C.A., M. V. Muthiah Government Arts College for Women, India.

(2) Akinbusola Olushola, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, United States.

(3) Maofuyou, Central South University, China.

(4) Naitik S T, Dayananda Sagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Bajpai, UPTEC, India.

(2) D. Hemanand, S.A. Engineering College, India.

(3) Hamid Kassiri, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(4) Jawad K. Ali, University of Technology Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.07/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. Sukanya M.C.A, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akinbusola Olushola, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maofuyou, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Naitik S T, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Khushboo Tigga, Sido Kanhu Murmu University, India.

(2) Ali Abdul Hussein S. AL-Janabi, Iraq.

(3) Abel Saka Gungure, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nour Alzaeed, Damascus University, Syria.

(2) Shazia Tahira, Bahria University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khushboo Tigga, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Abdul Hussein S. AL-Janabi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abel Saka Gungure, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bikas Raj Shah, The Ohio State University, United States of America.

(2) Sreedeep Dey, University of Calcutta, India.

(3) Anuj Singh, Bihar Animal Sciences University (BASU), India.

(4) Kawardeep Kour, SKUAST-J, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dipanjan Chakraborty, India.

(2) Sunil Arora, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bikas Raj Shah, United States of America) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sreedeep Dey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anuj Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kawardeep Kour, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Norshaqinah Binti Ayob, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Abesh Chakraborty, The Assam Royal Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sukanta Sarkar, Gambella University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Norshaqinah Binti Ayob, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abesh Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anate, S. Ganiyu, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Soukaina Azil, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anate, S. Ganiyu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soukaina Azil, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Swathiga, Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Amarnatha, N, College of Sericulture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Swathiga, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amarnatha, N, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatema Tuj Juhra, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

(2) Shambhu Prasad, Lalit Narayan Mithla University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) T.Bheem Rao, Government Degree College, Parkal, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatema Tuj Juhra, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shambhu Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. P. P. Dubey, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Punjab, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumi Das, Gauhati University, India.

(2) Jasmeet Singh, India.

(3) Mohsin Salahuddin, Pakistan Forest Institute (PFI), Pakistan.

(4) Arvind Sawane, Anand Niketan College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Basil A Abbas, University Of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Daylon Fundora Caballero, Cuba.

(3) Yani Maidelwita, Mercubaktijaya University, Indonesian.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumi Das, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jasmeet Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohsin Salahuddin, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arvind Sawane, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ryszard Traczyk, University of Gdansk, Poland.

(2) G Kondaiah, Yogi Vemana University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pablo Toriño, Universidad de la República, Uruguay.

(2) Toshibaa, Soban Singh Jeena University Champawat Campus Uttarakhand, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ryszard Traczyk, Poland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G Kondaiah, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA