Peer Review History: Bauhinia variegata Linn. (Fabaceae): Botanical Insights, Bioactive Constituents and Future in Nutraceuticals & Drug Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ifora, School of Pharmaceutical Science Padang, Indonesia.

(2) Nwefia Wilson Ifeanacho, Nasarawa State University, Nigeria.

(3) Shoaeb Mohammad Syed, Dayanand College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Maha Sabry Abd Elhafeez Ahmed, Animal Health Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Kumar, Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, India.

(2) Osamah Faisal Kokaz, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

(3) Pallavi Jamadagni, India.

(4) Tapan Kumar Mahato, Bhupal Nobles’ University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.47/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ifora, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nwefia Wilson Ifeanacho, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shoaeb Mohammad Syed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Maha Sabry Abd Elhafeez Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biocontrol of Water Hyacinth: Insights into Neochetina eichhorniae Warner and N. bruchi Hustache

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Nitharwal, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

(2) V.Abarna, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Madesh Kamalakannan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ranjan Singh, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Nitharwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V.Abarna,  India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Dietary Microbial Phytase Supplementation on the Performance, Bone Status and Nutrient Retention of Broilers Fed with Inorganic Phosphate-Free Diet

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) J. B. Butani, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Habib Ur Rehman, University of Balochistan Quetta, Pakistan.

(3) Mihai- Iacob Bențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (USAMVCN), Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamdev Sethy, OUAT, India.

(2) Mohammed Hamad Saleh, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. B. Butani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Habib Ur Rehman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mihai- Iacob Bențea, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Retention and Shelf Life Extension in the White Leg Shrimp Litopenaeus Vannamei (Boone, 1931) Using Acalypha indica Leaf Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers: 

(1) Rabab Jawad Hassen AL- Hasseny, AL-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Lina Sameer Mohammed, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jelang Jelku D. Sangma, College of Community Science, Central Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rabab Jawad Hassen AL- Hasseny, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lina Sameer Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Physical and Environmental Factors on the Life Cycle of the Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. P. Dubey, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Punjab, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamal Yadav, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, India.

(2) Kanika Kumari, Jagannath Jain College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepika Sorahia, India.

(2) Eulálio Gutemberg Dias dos Santos, Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil.

(3) Ghulam Hussain Khoso, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamal Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanika Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Climate Factors on the Growth and Development of Silkworm in West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Grzegorz Kopij, Wrocław University of Environmental & Life Sciences, Poland.

(2) Muhammad Saqib, Xian Jiaotong University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daylon Fundora Caballero, Cuba.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Grzegorz Kopij, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Saqib, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphometrical Parameters on the Development of Common Jay Butterfly, Graphium doson (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) on Ashoka Tree, Saraca asoca

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Monish Kumar Thapa, Assam Royal Global University, India.

(2) Shahriza Bin Shahrudin, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) T. Bheem Rao, Kakatiya University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rigoberto Alarcon Rojas, Universidad Politecnica Territorial De Merida “Kleber Ramirez” (UPTMKR), Venezuela.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monish Kumar Thapa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahriza Bin Shahrudin, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T. Bheem Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microplastics in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Review of Ecotoxicological Effects, Exposure Pathways and Trophic Transfer Risks

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nanu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nipun Bariya, Veer Narmad South Gujarat Univeristy Surat, India.

(2) Harmoko, Silampari PGRI University, Indonesia.

(3) Amardeepak M, Cambridge Institute of Technology North Campus, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nipun Bariya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harmoko, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amardeepak M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Morphometric Study of Indian Major Carps

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Shailendar Mogdumpuram, India.

(2) G. Kondaiah, Yogi Vemana University, India.

(3) Praveen Ojha, K R. PG College, Mathura, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shailendar Mogdumpuram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Kondaiah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Praveen Ojha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Heavy Metals Analysis in Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Channa striata (Bloch, 1793) from Poondi Lake, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora, Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Kumar Malhotra, Dr. BR Ambedkar Central University, India.

(2) Guillermo Bracamonte, Argentine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Renu Sharma, Om Sterling Global University, India.

(2) Sanjeev S. Gandhewar, RTM Nagpur University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandeep Kumar Malhotra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Guillermo Bracamonte, Argentine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA