Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Seun Michael Oyekunle, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

(2) Mohammed Salim Jasim AL-Taie, University of Misan, Iraq.

(3) S Rukmani Devi, SIMATS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Razzak Khan Qureshi, Medicaps University, India.

(2) N. Balakrishnan, Sona College of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seun Michael Oyekunle, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Salim Jasim AL-Taie, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S Rukmani Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Madhu Shivhare , NDVSU, India.

(2) Asmaa Yousuf Thanoon, Alnoor University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ranjith H K, Prakriya Hospitals, India.

(2) Rohit Kumar Singh, Sri Krishna Medical College, India.

(3) Vinu Choudhary, Bisu Hospital & Fertility Centre, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Madhu Shivhare, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asmaa Yousuf Thanoon, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fadzillah Adibah binti Fadzil Suhaimi, UCYP University, Malaysia.

(2) Pradip Kumar, C.C.S. University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fadzillah Adibah binti Fadzil Suhaimi, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradip Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Belisario Dominguez-Mancera, University Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Suhair  M. Yaseen, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Hasanain A.J. Gharban, University of Wasit, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G.Kalaiselvi, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suhair  M., Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hasanain A.J. Gharban, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shabnam Kumari, Teerthanker Mahaveer college of Agriculture Sciences, India.

(2) Erdal Zengin, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rukayya Garba Anchau, Nigerian Institute For Trypanosomiasis Research Kaduna, Nigeria.

(2) Samah Metwally Mahmoud Abd EL-Aziz, The National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shabnam Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Erdal Zengin, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Rudra Narayan Borkakati, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Akhilesh Kumar, College of Agriculture, India.

(3) Leishangthem Sarnabati Devi, Thambal Marik College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chaitanya, CSB-CSRTI, India.

(2) Maan Abdul Azeez Shafeeq, College of Science, Al-Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(3) Nandini Bhattachajee, Rishi Bankim Chandra College, India.

(4) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India.

(5) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rudra Narayan Borkakati, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akhilesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Leishangthem Sarnabati Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Stephen F. Sikolia, Maseno University, Kenya.

(3) Dilip K Kakavipure, B.N.N. college, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dharna Tembhare Bisen, JNKVV, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Stephen F. Sikolia, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dilip K Kakavipure, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Mama Julius, Innovative Institute of Agriculture, Business and Capacity Building , Uganda & South Sudan.

(2) Deepayan Roy, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Haidar Ali, Government Degree College Lengri Gular, India.

(2) Jovany gleen l. Allawan, University of Mindanao-Panabo College, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mama Julius, Uganda & South Sudan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepayan Roy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rohith Dhanasekaran, India.

(2) Dhinesh P, Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, India.

(3) Marcos Hernández-López, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Solanki, J.P.University,Chapra, India.

(2) Vinod Bhimrao Kakade, Eknath Sitaram Divekar Arts, Science and Commerce College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rohith Dhanasekaran, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhinesh P, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Marcos Hernández-López, Mexico) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manish Kumar Vijay, ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research institute, India.

(2) Naila Ghafoor, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kolangath Sujit Mathew, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manish Kumar Vijay, India) | File 1 |NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naila Ghafoor, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA