Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State University of Sonora, Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Pali Sahu, Oriental College of Technology, India.

(2) Simon Stephen Mshelia, Federal University Gashua, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pali Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Simon Stephen Mshelia, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V. V. Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Thakur Mandar Vijay, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Munawar Fazal, Patliputra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thakur Mandar Vijay, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Munawar Fazal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rashid Mumtaz Khan, Qassim University Saudi Arabia.

(2) C.Obula Reddy, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rashid Mumtaz Khan, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C.Obula Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Juan Izquierdo, Uruguay.

(2) Abdul Basit, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juan Izquierdo, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdul Basit, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Dahal, Khatyadi  Higher Secondary School, Nepal.

(2) Labib Intisar, Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anil Dahal, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Labib Intisar, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexander M Kerr, University of Guam, Guam.

(2) Gautam Satyavan Kadam, Sacred Heart College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Minakshi Dash, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alexander M Kerr, Guam) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gautam Satyavan Kadam, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Puspa Sari Dewi Solihah, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani (Unjani), Indonesia.

(2) Ahmad Baihaqi Bin Othman, Fisheries Research Institute, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rizal Irfandi, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Puspa Sari Dewi Solihah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmad Baihaqi Bin Othman, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pijush Payra, Ramnagar college, India.

(2) K.H.Kishara Bandaranayake, National Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency (NARA), Sri Lanka.

(3) Hanane KENNOUCHE, National High School of Marine Sciences and Coastal Management (ENSSMAL), Algeria.

(4) Hitesh Kardani, Kamdhenu University, India.

(5) La Sara, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pijush Payra, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K.H.Kishara Bandaranayake, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hanane KENNOUCHE, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hitesh Kardani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (La Sara, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Pijush Payra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (K.H.Kishara Bandaranayake, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arup Bandyopadhyay, Santiniketan Medical College, India.

(2) Yusuf Mukasa, Makerere University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arup Bandyopadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yusuf Mukasa, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Brijesh Kumar Yadav, DUVASU, India.

(2) Chinmay R. Warghat, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bikas Raj Shah, The Ohio State University, US.

(2) Rupali Rautela, India.

(3) Shriya gupta, Dr. Y.S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(4) Shubham Singha, India.

(5) Vikas Sachan, SVPUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Brijesh Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chinmay R. Warghat, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA