Peer Review History: Assessment of Population of Shark and Ray Fishes of Parangipettai Coastal Region, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State University of Sonora, Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjeev S. Gandhewar, RTM Nagpur University, India.

(2) Fereidun Mohebbi, Iranian Forests and Rangelands Research Institute, Iran.

(3) Anapana Gopal, Maharajah’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjeev S. Gandhewar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fereidun Mohebbi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anapana Gopal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Physico-chemical Water Quality Parameters and Vibrio spp. Occurrence in Penaeus vannamei Farms of Coastal Saurashtra Region, Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Parimala B., Tumkur University, India.

(2) Bhukya Bhaskar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Paramesh Godishala, Government Degree College, Rangasaipet, India.

(2) Saiprasad Bhusare, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Parimala B., T, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhukya Bhaskar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Biofilm forming Bacteria from the Surfaces of Different immersed Panels in the process of Biofouling

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Savio Benvindo Ferreira, Universidade Federal da Paraiba, Brazil.

(2) N. S. Udoekong, Akwa Ibom State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C. Uma, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Kalikota Pavan Kumar, Acharya Nagarjuna University, India.

(3) Noor Abdulameer Oudah, University of Kerbala, Karbala.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Savio Benvindo Ferreira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. S. Udoekong, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation and Evaluation of a Weed-Derived Hydrogel from Solanum nigrum for Anti-psoriatic Efficacy in Wistar albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Dattatray Anap, Dr.kolpe institute of pharmacy, India.

(2) Pankaj Agrawal, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, India.

(3) Shivshankar Madhukar Nagrik, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.

(4) Sanket Ashok Borude, Dharmraj Shaikshnaik Pratishthan College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anjna Rani, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology (Pharmacy Institute), India.

(2) Ankur thakur, Himachal Pharmacy College, Chitkara University, India.

(3) Dipak Dadasaheb Nalawade, Dr.kolpe institute of pharmacy, India.

(4) Mohit Pal, JBIT College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Virgilio Humberto Blandón Membreño, UAM, Nicaragua.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Dattatray Anap, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pankaj Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shivshankar Madhukar Nagrik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sanket Ashok Borude, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Vertical Transmission of White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) under Different Salinities in Experimental Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Wayan Kantun, Institute of Maritime Technology and Business, Indonesia.

(2) Sushil Bera, Khejuri College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wayan Kantun, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushil Bera, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Vulnerable Wildlife under Siege: A Comprehensive Threats Study in Rupi Bhaba Wildlife Sanctuary, Himachal Pradesh, and Proactive Mitigation Pathways

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Serdar DUSEN, Pamukkale University, Turkey.

(2)Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Christiana Nkuturum, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Ismael Martins Pereira , Universidade Estadual De Goias – UEG, Brazil.

(3) Kuldeep Bora, Assam University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajaz Ahmed Wani, Govt.PG College, Bhaderwah, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Christiana Nkuturum, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ismael Martins Pereira , Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kuldeep Bora, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinico-Pathological and Molecular Diagnosis of Ccpp in Goats: A Case Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Shanaz Bashir, Shere-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

(2) Anuj Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shanaz Bashir, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuj Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Association of Antral Follicle Count and Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone Concentration with Age and Parity in Ongole (Bos indicus) Cattle

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Gaman Sharma , Agriculture and Forestry University, Nepal.

(2) Zeynab Bayat, University of Debrecen, Hungary.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Japheth Joel Kalang, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Zirak M R Palani, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gaman Sharma , Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zeynab Bayat, Hungary) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Parity, Lactation Stage, Udder and Teat Morphology on Milk Yield and Composition of Kankrej Cows under Organized Farm Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. P. Dubey, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sukma Aditya Sitepu, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia.

(2) Thabang Luther Mashilo, University of the Free State, South Africa.

(3) Nancy Sheoran , Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Garima Choudhary, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sukma Aditya Sitepu, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thabang Luther Mashilo, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nancy Sheoran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Zootherapy and Cultural Symbolism among Indigenous Communities in Lower Soureni Busty of Darjeeling Hills

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo, University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Haidar Ali, Government  Degree College Lengri Gular, India.

(2) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

(3) Bondareva Lesia, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lovely Rahaman. Techno India University Tripura, India.

(2) Yogesh Pandharinath Shinde, Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haidar Ali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhananjay Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bondareva Lesia, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA