Peer Review History: Assessing Public Interest in Biodiversity and Wildlife Conservation through Google Search Trends in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. P. P. Dubey, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Punjab, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumi Das, Gauhati University, India.

(2) Jasmeet Singh, India.

(3) Mohsin Salahuddin, Pakistan Forest Institute (PFI), Pakistan.

(4) Arvind Sawane, Anand Niketan College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Basil A Abbas, University Of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Daylon Fundora Caballero, Cuba.

(3) Yani Maidelwita, Mercubaktijaya University, Indonesian.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumi Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jasmeet Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohsin Salahuddin, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arvind Sawane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of Sagittal Otolith Morphometry with Fish Size between 4 Species of Genus Puntius (Hamilton, 1822) of Family Cyprinidae from Ganga River, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ryszard Traczyk, University of Gdansk, Poland.

(2) G Kondaiah, Yogi Vemana University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pablo Toriño, Universidad de la República, Uruguay.

(2) Toshibaa, Soban Singh Jeena University Champawat Campus Uttarakhand, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ryszard Traczyk, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G Kondaiah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Butterflies of Chhattisgarh, India: Updated Checklist with 19 Additions to the State Fauna

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Moitreyee Chakrabarty, Durgapur Government College, Kazi Nazrul University, India.

(2) Minakshi Dash, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sojomon Mathew, Government College Kottayam, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moitreyee Chakrabarty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Minakshi Dash, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diversity, Abundance and Habitat Preferences of Freshwater and Terrestrial Mollusks in Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, India: A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Qasim Al-Taher, University of Sumer, Iraq.

(2) Prachi Sachchidanand Hatkar, DES Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qasim Al-Taher, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prachi Sachchidanand Hatkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antidiabetic Activity of Aegle marmelos Fruit Pulp Extract in Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Richa Dodiya, ITM SLS Baroda University, India.

(2) A.Benno Susai Vijayakumar, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohsina Patwekar, Luqman College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Richa Dodiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A.Benno Susai Vijayakumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Financial Profitability Analysis of Naga Chilli Production in Sylhet District of Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Amose, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(2) Mustafa Göktuğ Kaya, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Regasa Dibaba, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T. Amose, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mustafa Göktuğ Kaya, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Dual GIP/GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes: A New Era in Incretin Therapy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Aya Raed Abdulwahaab Alheany, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

(2) Prerna Khati, Mangalyatan University, India.

(3) Chikezie, Onyebuchi Desmond, Gregory University Uturu, Nigeria.

(4) Rajeev Kumria, Shri Venkateshwara University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Divya C, University Of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Jagroop Singh, Government Medical College Amritsar, India.

(3) Jhakeshwar Prasad, Shri Shankaracharya College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(4) Masumi Kamiyama, Jumonji University, Japan.

(5) Sachin Balkrishna Somwanshi, Pravara Rural Education Society’s College of Pharmacy, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(6) Thualfiqar Ghalib Turki, Al-Qassim Green University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aya Raed Abdulwahaab Alheany, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prerna Khati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chikezie, Onyebuchi Desmond, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Rajeev Kumria, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria from Penaeus vannamei Shrimp Farming: Challenges and Importance of Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Akhil Kumar S., University of Kerala, India.

(2) Otchoumou Kraidy Athanase, Cote d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ghada Abdul-Razzaq Mohammad, University of Mosul, college of science, Iraq.

(2) Muhammad Rizwan, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akhil Kumar S., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Otchoumou Kraidy Athanase, Cote d’Ivoire) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Feeding Dynamics and Diet Composition of Black-Banded Trevally [Seriolina nigrofasciata (1829)] from the South-East Arabian Sea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Desimira Stroe, Institute of Research and Development for Aquatic Ecology, Romania.

(2) Neelesh Kumar, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Harpreet Kaur Sodhi, Army College Of Nursing, India.

(2) Hellen Nanlohy, Pattimura University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Desimira Stroe, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neelesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Sowing Dates on the Seasonal Abundance of Mustard Aphid [L. erysimi (Kalt)] and Associated Natural Enemies in Vidarbha, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo, University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shweta Patel, ANDUAT, India.

(2) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Amirijami, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Iran.

(2) Fabricio M. De Almeida, UFRO, Brasil.

(3) Hawraa Yahya Mohammed, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(4) Pancras Ndokoye, University of Technology and Arts of Byumba-UTAB, Rwnda.

(5) Sagarika Dehury, OUAT, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shweta Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA