Peer Review History: Shrimp Aquaculture in Inland Saline Waters of Haryana: A Step towards Sustainable Aquafarming

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Euclides Pereira e Silva, Federal Institute of Pará, Portugal.

(2) Gürel Türkmen, Ege University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Euclides Pereira e Silva, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gürel Türkmen, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Brinjal Fruit and Shoot Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) Using Biopesticides and Botanicals

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shakal Khan Korai, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Pakistan.

(2) Zina Mohammed Sarhan, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sirichai Junphum, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shakal Khan Korai, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zina Mohammed Sarhan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Empirical Assessment of Diversity in Fish Species: Case Study of Madhubani District, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sajal Jana, Dinabandhu Andrews College, University of Calcutta, India.

(2) Samuel Sheikh, B.N. College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sajal Jana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel Sheikh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Synthetic Hormone on Breeding Potential of Gold Fish (Carassius auratus)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) G.Kopij, Wrocław University of Environmental & Life Sciences, Poland.

(2) Angsuman Chanda, Raja N. L. Khan Women’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) May M.Eid, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Kopij, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angsuman Chanda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence of Major Insect Pests of Green Gram and Management of Helicoverpa armigera Hubner on Using Bio-Pesticides

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Onyedikachi Ubani, University of South Africa, South Africa.

(2) Priyanka Balley, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Onyedikachi Ubani, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priyanka Balley, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bio Efficacy of Bio Pesticides against Spotted Pod Borer (Maruca vitrata Geyer) Infesting Black Gram

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Satyabrata Sarangi, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Serhii Rieznik, State Biotechnological University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rigoberto Fimia Duarte, University of Medical Sciences of Villa Clara (UCM-VC), Cuba.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satyabrata Sarangi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Serhii Rieznik, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Distribution and Abundance of Seven Spotted Ladybird Beetle (Coccinella septempunctata) Linnaeus in Different Cropping System at Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mounia Amoura, Chadli Bendjedid University, Algeria.

(2) Dalip Kumar, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mounia Amoura, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dalip Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Taxonomic Diversity of Danionid Fishes of Brahmaputra Basin, Assam, North-East India: An Effort towards the Conservation of Small Indigenous Fish

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahid Amjad, Institute of Business Management, Pakistan.

(2) Jaiswar Rahul Ramasre, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A.S.Maheswari, Seethalakshmi Ramaswami College, India.

(2) Rahman, Pattimura University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahid Amjad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jaiswar Rahul Ramasre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Present Status of Fish Diversity and Population Abundance of Selected Fish Species in Khudiya Dam, Mungeli Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oğuzhan Yildiz, Associate Professor, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Hauwa O. Sadiq, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(2) Nazia Dharejo, University of Sindh, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hauwa O. Sadiq, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nazia Dharejo, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Contaminants in Honey: Safeguarding Quality and Consumer Health

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) T.Purushoth Prabhu, C L Baid Metha College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, India.

(2) Mxolisi Justice Ndlovu, University of Limpopo, South Africa.

(3) B M Gurupadayya, JSS College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T. Purushoth Prabhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mxolisi Justice Ndlovu, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B M Gurupadayya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA