Peer Review History: Impacts and Effects of Pollution on Marine and Coastal Resources

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Givanildo de Gois, Federal University of Acre, Campus Cruzeiro do Sul, Brazil.

(2) M.Seidgar, National Artemia Research Center, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Iran.

(3) Emelio Barjau Gonzalez, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Nadeem Khan, SAMC&PGI, SAU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Givanildo de Gois, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Seidgar, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Emelio Barjau Gonzalez, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antifeedant Activity of Selected Botanicals Against the Larvae of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mano Elias, Institut de Recherche en Sciences Appliquées et Technologies, Burkina Faso.

(2) H Manoranjan Sharma, Waikhom Mani Girls’ College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hisham Mohamed El-Bassouiny, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mano Elias, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (H Manoranjan Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Animal Biotechnology and Intellectual Property Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Mbaye Tine, Gaston Berger University, Senegal.

(2) Shashi Pradhan, N.D.V.S.U Jabalpur, India.

(3) Rômulo Batista Rodrigues, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mbaye Tine, Senegal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shashi Pradhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rômulo Batista Rodrigues, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable Aquaculture of Hilsa in India and Legal Perspectives: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Hussein M. Traboulsi, Lebanese University, Lebanon.

(2) Husain Latuconsina, Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tamer El-Sayed Ali, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hussein M. Traboulsi, Lebanon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Husain Latuconsina, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unveiling the Ancient Wisdom: Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties of Pavetta indica

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Abd Hasan Kidhim, Al Muthanna University, Iraq.

(2) Dario Siniscalco, University of Campania, Italy.

(3) B Lakshminarayanan, Sanjo College of Pharmaceutical Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Reviewers:

(1)Mariusz Mojzych, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Poland.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Abd Hasan Kidhim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dario Siniscalco, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B Lakshminarayanan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Bee Products in Cosmetic and Skincare Industry: Current Trends and Future Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashwini N, Adichunchanagiri Ayurvedic Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, India.

(2) Mykola Zhelavskyi, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chinthan Kajjari, Alva’s Ayurveda Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashwini N, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mykola Zhelavskyi, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Feeder Designs on the Development of Osmanabadi Goat Kids

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Belisario Dominguez-Manceram University Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Neeraj Singh, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Raimi Christie Oluwatosin, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neeraj Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raimi Christie Oluwatosin, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Green Synthesis and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles from Mukia maderaspatana (L.) Roem. Leaf Extract and their Antibacterial Activity

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Angelo Mark P. Walag, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Rana Muhammad Mazhar Ali, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Ehab Ahmad Hammod, University of Samarra, Iraq.

(3) Entidhar Jasim Khamees, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G.Siva Perumal, Dhirajlal Gandhi College of Technology Salem, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rana Muhammad Mazhar Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ehab Ahmad Hammod, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Entidhar Jasim Khamees, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation and Characterisation of Octa Siloxane from Catharanthus roseus Leaf Extract by Molecular Docking Analysis as Insecticide Against, Aedes vittatus, (Diptera: Culicidae)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

(2) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi Degree College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Wawan Ridwan, Indonesia.

(2) Maria Fatima L. Parro, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wawan Ridwan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maria Fatima L. Parro, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies of the Arsenic Toxicity Level in Rice Crop and Paddy Straw in Chhattishgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Levent Son, Professor, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sorgho Brahima, University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Burkina Faso.

(2) Hanadi K. Ibrahim, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Felix Uba, University of Energy And Natural Resources, GHANA.

(2) Pratibha s.Kurup, Bharti University, India.

(3) Rachadaporn Benchawattananon, Khon Kaen University, ThaiLand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sorgho Brahima, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanadi K. Ibrahim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA