Peer Review History: Synergistic Anti Inflammatory Effects of Galangin and Piperine in a Bleomycin Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis Model in Mice

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Usmangani Tabani, Christ College, India.

(2) Asema Mahveen, KNR University of Health Sciences, India.

(3) Shankar S. Yelmame, MIT Vishwaprayag University, India.

(4) Aref Nooraei, ILAM, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aref Nooraei, Ilam, Iran.

(2) Jhakeshwar Prasad, Shri Shankaracharya College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Usmangani Tabani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asema Mahveen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shankar S. Yelmame, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Aref Nooraei, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Pre-Mating Behavior and Reproductive Indicators in Indian Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) with Ethogram

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East,  Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Kumar, Government Degree College, India.

(2) Abdullah Hameed Salim, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq.

(3) Thabang Luther Mashilo, University of the Free State, South Africa.

(4) Sentiyanger Longkumer, Patkai Christian College , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jitendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdullah Hameed Salim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Thabang Luther Mashilo, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sentiyanger Longkumer, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Harnessing Genetic Tools for Next-Generation Pest Management: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravikumar D. Dodiya, India.

(2) Suneel Kumar Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravikumar D. Dodiya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suneel Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms and β-Lactamase Interactions with Ceftriaxone and Linezolid

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

(2) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarah Ahmed Babani, Kirkuk University, Iraq.

(2) Pedamallu Niharika, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Delia Gambino, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia “A. Mirri”, Italy.

(2) Muhammad Tariq Zeb, Veterinary Research Institute, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarah Ahmed Babani, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pedamallu Niharika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Assessment of the Fish Assemblage in Dolphin-inhabited Areas of Assam

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Manas Paramanik, Kazi Nazrul University, India.

(2) Sarip Tarita A. Ampatuan-Ali, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maria Carolina Lima Farias Duarte, UFS – Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil.

(2) Syafrialdi, Muara Bungo University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manas Paramanik, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sarip Tarita A. Ampatuan-Ali, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Potential of Phytochemicals Present in the Polyherbal Formulation Aarumuga Chooranam in Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): An in silico Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(2) Prof.  Ashish Anand, University of Mississipi Medical Center and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Gunasekar Manoharan, USA.

(2) Shubham Bhatt, India.

(3) Suraj G. Malpani, Shivlingeshwar College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Negetha Subramanieam, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farkad Hawas Musa, University Of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Iftikhar Ali, Baba Guru Nanak University Nankana Sahib, Pakistan.

(3) Jyoti Mayekar, Bhavan’s College, India.

(4) Pankaj Kumar, Baba Farid College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(5) Rana Saleh Al-Difaie, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

(6) Samah Metwally Mahmoud Abd EL-Aziz, Egypt.

(7) Suhair  M. Yaseen, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.72/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gunasekar Manoharan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubham Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suraj G. Malpani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Negetha Subramanieam, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Neuropsychological and Clinical Effects of Indian Classical Ragas: A Narrative Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA And William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) R.Sobana, India.

(2) Dian Pratiwi, Indonesia.

(3) Dinesh C Sharma, K.M. Govt. Girls P.G. College, India.

(4) Sumbul Zehra, Galgotias University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abey Varughese, Sharbati College of Nursing, India.

(2) Ana Paula Rodrigues Carvalho Coutinho Almeida, Hospital das Forças Armadas polo porto, Portugal.

(3) Behnoush Sabayan, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(4) Pamela Siegel, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil.

(5) Pipih Napisah, Indonesia.

(6) Roohi Mittal, Amity Institute of Behavioural (Health) and Allied Sciences, Amity University, India.

(7) Satarupa Deka, Assam down town University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R.Sobana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dian Pratiwi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dinesh C Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sumbul Zehra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Foraging Patterns and Habitat Utilisation upon Water Bird Diversity in Gaya District, Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Azimah Binti Abd Rahman, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Mohommad Miraj Hussain, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajaz Ahmed Wani, Govt.PG College Bhaderwah, Indian.

(2) Hossein Javanbakht, University of Guilan, Iran.

(3) Nsor Charles Ayuk, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

(4) Vibhakar A. Jani, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Azimah Binti Abd Rahman, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohommad Miraj Hussain, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of different compositions of rice straw on nutrient profile of vermicompost and fecundity of earthworms (Eisenia fetida)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Omar Jamal Mahdi, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Antonio Francisco de Sousa, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Okon Wilson, Akwa Ibom State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Ibraheem Mohammed Aliyas, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Tambe Ram Shivaji, SPPU, Pune Arts, Commerce & Science, College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omar Jamal Mahdi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Antonio Francisco de Sousa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Insecticidal Treatment Schedules for Managing Soil Pests and Enhancing Potato Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanhita Chowdhury, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Abdul Salam Mafatoon, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Abdul Waseem, Institute of Agri-Food, Animal and Environmental Sciences (ICA3), University of O’Higgins, Chile.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanhita Chowdhury, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdul Salam Mafatoon, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA