Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Vidhin Sundar Kamble, India.

(2) Ankush Sharma, Sri Sai University, India.

(3) Raghvendra Niranjan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C.Sudha, National College, India.

(2) Prashant Prahakar Ingale, Rshtra Sant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur Univesity, India.

(3) S.Mohamed Ramlath Sabura, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

(4) Sheetal Anand, University of Lucknow, India.

(5) Sunita Satyendra Gupta, Amolakchand Mahavidyalaya, India.

(6) Yalla Poli Naidu, Dr B R Ambedkar University Srikakulam, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vidhin Sundar Kamble, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankush Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Raghvendra Niranjan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho,University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Harsh Vishwakarma, Indian Institute of Technology Indore (IIT Indore), India.

(2) Zarna Vora, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gajendrasingh Pachlore, Vinayak Vidnyan Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) V. Gokula Krishnan, Easwari Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harsh Vishwakarma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zarna Vora, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) C. D. Patil, SPPU, India.

(2) Chandan Nayak, ARKA JAIN University, India.

(3) Chadi Khatib, Manara University, Syria.

(4) Nitika Hans, Government Medical College, Amritsar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A Vasantha Kumari, The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, India.

(2) Marija Draganic Vulanovic, University “Mediterranean”, Podgorica; First secondary vocational school, Montenegro.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.375/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. D. Patil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chandan Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chadi Khatib, Syria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nitika Hans, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shereen Kouser, India.

(2) Zübeyde Nur YALÇIN, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bankerdonbor Kharbisnop, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shereen Kouser, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zübeyde Nur YALÇIN, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Anju Jain, Daulat Ram College, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Magdalene Kharbangar, Synod College, Shillong, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil Savji Kotiya, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) M. Srinivasulu Reddy, Sri Venkateswara University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anju Jain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Magdalene Kharbangar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago,  University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Qazi Shehriyar Sahib, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.

(2) Nguyễn Thuý Hạnh, Vietnam Sericulture Research Center, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rima Abou Tarrieh, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qazi Shehriyar Sahib, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nguyễn Thuý Hạnh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayşe Nur AYDIN, Türkiye.

(2) Truong Xuan Lam, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandralekha Deka, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Adarsha Mahabidyalaya, India.

(2) Erhan Ünlü, University of Dicle, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayşe Nur AYDIN, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Truong Xuan Lam, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Christopher John Zomuana Lawlor, Government Kolasib College, India.

(2) Vinod V K, KVASU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Disouky Mohamed Mourad, Egypt.

(2) Munir Ahmad Bhinder, University of Health Sciences, Pakistan.

(3) Vinod VK, KVASU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Christopher John Zomuana Lawlor, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinod V K, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nanu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Akinkunle Victor Adeniyi, Federal University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(2) Alyaa Abdul-Ridha Hanash, Wasit University, Iraq.

(3) Erhan Ünlü, University of Dicle, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kristijan Franin, University of Zadar, Croatia.

(2) BELEM Adama, Burkina Faso.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akinkunle Victor Adeniyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alyaa Abdul-Ridha Hanash, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Erhan Ünlü, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Pathma J, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University, India.

(2) Kalmesh Managanvi, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pathma J, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kalmesh Managanvi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA