Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Susanta Nath, University of Burdwan, India.

(2) Israr Maqbool, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan.

(3) Selim Reza, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Susanta Nath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Israr Maqbool, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Selim Reza, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Muthupandi, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, India.

(2) Naveen Joshi, India.

(3) P. Giridhar, Sri Krishnadevaraya Univesrsity, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Reza, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Muthupandi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naveen Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Giridhar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) P N Harathi, ANGRAU-Agricultural Research Station, India.

(2) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India.

(3) Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, State University of Rio Grande do Sul – Vacaria Unit – Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.96/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P N Harathi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravi Kumar Rajak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Chinwe Justice-Alucho, Clemson University, United States.

(2) Heri Ariadi, University of Pekalongan, Indonesian.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chinwe Justice-Alucho, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Heri Ariadi, Indonesian) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelhamid Abdalla Esbata, Misurata University, Libya.

(2) Deepti Tomar, PMCOE, Govt. College, India.

(3) Dwarka, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Khamar, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco.

(2) P.N. Harathi, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(3) Sachin Mahadev Chavan, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(4) Sama Jawad Al-Zuwaini, College of Science for Women, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(5) Sedighe Ashtari, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdelhamid Abdalla Esbata, Libya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepti Tomar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dwarka, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Kale Bala Nirmala, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(2) Vijayalakshmidevi Sangeetham Raghuraman, USA.

(3) Nishant Verma, School of Pharmacy, BIT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) BVS Praveen, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology (CBIT), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kale Bala Nirmala, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vijayalakshmidevi Sangeetham Raghuraman, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nishant Verma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Țugulea Cristina, Moldova State University, Republic of Moldova.

(2) Arjuna Apparao Adari, SGA Govt.Degree College, India.

(3) Oyini Daniel Akwuma, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University Bauchi, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chhote Lal Chowdhary, Nepal.

(2) Murugaragavan Ramasamy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) Razafimanantsoa Tsiresy Maminiaina, Institut Supérieur de Technologie d’Ambositra, Madagascar.

(4) Somayeh Ghahari, University of Mazandran, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Țugulea Cristina, Republic of Moldova) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arjuna Apparao Adari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Oyini Daniel Akwuma, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Hussein Gobena, Werabe University, Ethiopia.

(2) Jyotsana, LUVAS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dharmasoth Ram Devi, Vignan Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) LAKHDARI Kaouthar, Algeria.

(3) Mohammed Ali Makki AlRubaee, Wasit University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Hussein Gobena, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyotsana,  India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nambage Shirani Chandrasiri, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.

(2) Iman Abbas Ali, Diyala University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nambage Shirani Chandrasiri, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iman Abbas Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar Anvarovich, Scientific Research Institute of Sericulture, Uzbekistan.

(2) Adnan Hussain, Pakistan.

(3) Kamidi Rahul, Central Sericultural Research & Training Institute-Berhampore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Osama Hefny Abdelshaffy Mahmoud Matloup, Egypt.

(2) Rohini Pandurang Kamble, Swami ramanand Teerth Marathwada University Nanded, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar Anvarovich, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adnan Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kamidi Rahul, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA