Peer Review History: Heavy Metal Uptake and Associated Ecological Hazards in Parapenaeopsis atlantica from a Nigerian Estuarine Ecosystem

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Levent Son, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Thaise Dalferth Zancan, Federal University of Rio Grande, Brazil.

(2) Anate, S. Ganiyu, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, ,Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thaise Dalferth Zancan, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anate, S. Ganiyu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Performance of Bombyx mori L. via Nutrient-fortified Mulberry Leaves

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, University of Basrah¸ Iraq.

(2) Kamidi Rahul, Central Sericultural Research & Training Institute, India.

(3) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar Аnvarovich, Scientific Research Institute Of Sericulture Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamidi Rahul, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar Аnvarovich, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Heavy Metal Profile of a Southern River, Kerala, India: A Quantitative Assessment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sujal K. Revankar, Karnatak University, India.

(2) Joseph Omeiza Alao, Air Force Institute of Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Munther Hamza Rathi, University of Diyala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Ghanim Chfat, jabir Ibn Hayyan University for Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

(2) Antoine Vayaraï Manaoda, University of Douala, Cameroon.

(3) Henry Ohaegbuchu, Michael Okpara University of  Agriculture, Nigeria.

(4) Manaoda Antoine Vayaraï, University of Douala, Cameroon.

(5) Rupak Kumar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sujal K. Revankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joseph Omeiza Alao, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Munther Hamza Rathi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Histo-Morphological and Ultra-Structural Study of the Effect of a New Sulfa Drug Derivative on Brain and Liver Poisoning by Cypermethrin in Male Domestic Pigeons (Columba livia)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Lamis Mohamed Nader Saad, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Tugce Ordu, Türkiye.

(3) Temesgen Roro Duressa, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agwu Ani Ekwe, Federal Polytechnic Ngodo-Isuochi, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lamis Mohamed Nader Saad,Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tugce Ordu, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Temesgen Roro Duressa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis of Some Vital Structures of Oncorhynchus mykiss (Family: Salmonidae) from Kashmir Himalayas

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Ikbal Illijas, Pangkep State Polytechnic of Agriculture, Indonesia.

(2) Ima Kusumanti, IPB University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Ikbal Illijas, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ima Kusumanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis and Characterization of a New Sulfa-drug Derivative and Application on Cypermethrin-poisoned Domestic Pigeons (Columba livia)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Diepiriye Chenaboso Okujagu, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) K Pushpa, Indo German Global Academy for Agroecology Research and Learning, (IGGAARL), India.

(3) Mukesh Gangwar, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, (BASU, Patna), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Indraneel saha, University Of Calcutta, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Diepiriye Chenaboso Okujagu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K Pushpa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mukesh Gangwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bio-efficacy of Different Plant Products against Earhead Bug (Leptocorisa spp.) on Rice (Tulaipanji) in Old Alluvial Zone, West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Nor Hairul Bin Palal, Malaysia.

(2) G.Anitha, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Andrey Popatanasov, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.

(2) Archana Hemant Patil, S. M. Joshi College Hadapsar, India.

(3) Rashmi Gupta, Chandigarh University, India.

(4) Soudabeh Nourzad, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nor Hairul Bin Palal, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G.Anitha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hymenopteran Species Diversity Recorded on Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Intercropped with Garlic and Lemongrass Plants in West-Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Padmanaban Balakrishnan, ICAR-National Research Centre for Banana, India.

(2) Anshu Chaudhary, CCSU, Meerut, India.

(3) Nidheesh T. D, ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Padmanaban Balakrishnan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anshu Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nidheesh T. D, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Stock Assessment, Market Trends, and Export Potential of Cephalopod Fisheries (Loligo duvaucelii and Sepia pharaonis) in Visakhapatnam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. P. Dubey, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Punjab, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Gaber Desouky, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Egypt.

(2) Haidar Ali, Government  Degree College Lengri Gular, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eva Prasetiyono, Bogor Agricultural University, University of Bangka Belitung, Indonesia.

(2) Mohammed Gaber Desouky, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dr. Mohammed Gaber Desouky, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dr. Haidar Ali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: PBDE’s exposure in fishes and endocrine disruption and neurodevelopmental toxicity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aashikkumar M. Nagwanshi, RTM Nagpur University, India.

(2) Chetna Mishra, King George’s Medical University, India.

(3) Swapna. S, University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Poonam Singh, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aashikkumar M. Nagwanshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chetna Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Swapna. S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA