Peer Review History: Demography of Porcellio scaber Latreille, 1804 in Relation to Soil Characteristics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shailendar Mogdumpuram, India.

(2) Julia Barbosa Galo, Brazil.

(3) A.A.Arunkumar, Karpagam Academy Of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Kumar Sharma, The ICFAI University Jaipur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shailendar Mogdumpuram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Julia Barbosa Galo, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A.A.Arunkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Two New Distributional Records of Sponges along the West Coast of India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sula Salani Mota, Universidade do Distrito Federal Professor Jorge Amaury Maia NuNEs (UNDF), Brazil.

(2) Sandip Chatterjee, Gopal Narayan Singh University, India.

(3) Pegah Gheshlaghi, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vivekanand Bharti, ICAR- Research Complex for Eastern Region, India.

(2) Abid Raza, Hamdard University, Pakistan.

(4) Mohammad Ridwan Lessy, Universitas Khairun, Indonesia.

(5) Nasrullah Rastegar-Pouyani, Razi University, Iran.

(6) Seyed Ehsan Vesal, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Italy.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sula Salani Mota, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sandip Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pegah Gheshlaghi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (No res) | NA | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Decline) | NA | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diagnostic Role of Triphasic Computed Tomography in Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions: A Prospective Observational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Dasika Sree Rama Chandra Murthy, UCEOU, India.

(2) Rathan Kumar CH, Keshav Memorial Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: 

(1) Dilip Kr. Goswami, I.A Ayurvedic Medical College , University of Science and Technology Meghalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dasika Sree Rama Chandra Murthy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rathan Kumar CH, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Therapies, Challenges and Research Frontiers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Suprakash Chaudhury, Dr D Y Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Center, Pimpri, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Joyce Santana Rizzi, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Brazil.

(2) Nagehan Bilgeç, Kayseri City Hospital, Turkey.

(3) Ilyas Yücel, Dicle University, Turkey.

(4) Mohd Tauseef Alam, Central Research Institute of Unani Medicine, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamran Saeed, The Southern University of Science and Technology, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joyce Santana Rizzi, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nagehan Bilgeç, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ilyas Yücel, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mohd Tauseef Alam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Preliminary Study on Biofilm Formation of Pasteurella multocida Isolated from Goats in Malang, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Khem Raj Sharma, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, India.

(2) Tayseer Idrees, Sudan.

(3) Hanadi Abdulelah Abdulrazzaq, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(4) Edison Pascal, Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hanadi Abdulelah Abdulrazzaq, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(2) Shumate Kebede Hirpa, Dire Dawa University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khem Raj Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tayseer Idrees, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hanadi Abdulelah Abdulrazzaq, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Edison Pascal, Venezuela) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Central Vestibular Disease in a Pug Breed Dog Secondary to Ehrlichia canis Infection

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Matheus Garcia Lopes, University of Uberaba, Brazil.

(2) Daniela Enache, Sweden.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Matheus Garcia Lopes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniela Enache, Sweden) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on the utilization of entomopathogenic microorganisms for the biological suppression of Soil-dwelling Insect Pests: Advances, Constraints, and Future Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Debashis Mandal, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Kedarnath, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Awaneesh Kumar, Raffles University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debashis Mandal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kedarnath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Diversity of Helminths on faecal matter of local backyard fowls in Bishnupur Districts, Manipur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Hayder M. Mohammed, Iraq.

(2) A. Anand Kumar, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

(3) De Love Son Lakhani, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hayder M. Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Anand Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (De Love Son Lakhani, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Water Quality Analysis of Coastal Lake of Kalamboli, Navi Mumbai, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sobiya Gul, SKUAST K, India.

(2) Purushothaman T, SNMV College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alhassan Abdul Latif Husein, Tamale Technical University, Ghana.

(2) B. Babu, Indra Ganesan College Of Engineering, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sobiya Gul, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Purushothaman T, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Qualitative and Molecular Characterization of Rugda Mushroom: A Comprehensive Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Belisario Dominguez-Mancera, University Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Vignesh, Palar Agricultural College, India.

(2) Sanyogita Shahi, Kalinga University, India.

(3) Okafor Maryrose Chikaosolu, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Praveen Kumar Dasari, Mother Teresa Pharmacy College, India.

(2) Sakariyau Adio Waheed, Old Dominion University, United States Of America.

(3) Sanyogita Shahi, Kalinga University, India.

(4) Sreedeep Dey, University of Calcutta, India.

(5) Tambe Ram Shivaji, Arts, Commerce & Science College satral, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Vignesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanyogita Shahi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Okafor Maryrose Chikaosolu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2