Peer Review History: Study of the Hematological and Histopathological changes induced by Cypermethrin in Anabas testudineus (Bloch, 1792)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Jasim Mohammed Al-Azawi, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Aman Kumar, Ranchi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shao-Wen Hung, Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Taiwan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Jasim Mohammed Al-Azawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aman Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gut Microbiome Profiling of Eri Silkworm (Samia ricini) through 16S rRNA and Its Impact on Silk Yield in Dimapur, Nagaland, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

(2) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjai Kumar Gupta, VBS Government Post Graduate College, India.

(2) Satadal Chakrabarti, Central Sericultural Research & Training Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjai Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satadal Chakrabarti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Study on Antibacterial Potentiality of Ruellia tuberosa and Andrographis paniculata Extracts from Medicinal Garden of St. Ann’s Campus, Visakhapatnam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, University of Mississipi Medical Center and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Beatrice Atieno Otieno, Moi University, Kenya.

(2) Efe m. Omwirhiren, Federal University College Of Education, Nigeria.

(3) P. Gridhar, SVGM Govt Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Giridhar, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, India.

(2) Somanan Liphan, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan SURIN Campus, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Beatrice Atieno Otieno, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Efe m. Omwirhiren, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Gridhar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Indigenous Adaptive Techniques for Effective Ericulture in Kokrajhar District, BTR, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjai Kumar Gupta, VBS Government Post Graduate College, Campierganj, India.

(2) Gilberto Dinis Cozzer, Communitarian University of Chapecó Region, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Haslina, Semarang University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjai Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gilberto Dinis Cozzer, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Uniqueness of Association of Fern and Insect in the Field

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeremiah Agada, Nigeria.

(2) Prabhu Prasanna Pradhan, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil K, NSS College Ottapalam, University of Calicut, India.

(2) Ashutosh Singh, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Erdal ZENGİN, Türkiye.

(4) Hadeel Kamil Khaleel, Al-Iraqia University, Iraq.

(5) Kosisochukwu Dematus Onyeagba, University of Cincinnati, United States of America.

(6) Kumari Akanksha, Biotechnology Birla Institute of Technology, Jharkhand, India.

(7) Swapna.S, University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeremiah Agada, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prabhu Prasanna Pradhan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unusual Wingspan Records in Two Congeneric Pierid Butterfly Species Catopsilia pomona (Fabricius, 1775) and Catopsilia pyranthe (Linnaeus, 1758) from Rajgir Wildlife Sanctuary, Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE.

(2) P. Lakshmi Devi Menon, NSS College, India.

(3) Sunita Satyendra Gupta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Lakshmi Devi Menon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunita Satyendra Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Extinction to Opposition: The Double Threat Facing Zoology in Modern Society Through the Lens of Australia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, IRAQ.

Reviewers:

(1) Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Laikipia University, Kenya.

(2) Mohammed Kasso Geda, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

(3) Turcu Simona Laura, “Dinicu Golescu” Technical College, “Lower Danube” University of Galati, România.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Kasso Geda, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Turcu Simona Laura, România) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A physiological Study to Compare the Effect of Catechin and lovastatin on Obesity through Histological Examination of the liver in Albino Rats.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manal Mohammed El-Sayed Mohammed , Zagazig University, Egypt.

(2) Vinoth Kumar Ganesan, Govt General Hospital, Rangaraya Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bolisetty.Padmavathi, Chalapathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Pradeep Thorat, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Igbayilola Yusuff Dimeji, Baze University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manal Mohammed El-Sayed Mohammed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinoth Kumar Ganesan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact and Creation of Added Value of Creative Culture in Improving Organizational Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Abdelraheem Farghaly, Sohag University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mariana Simanjuntak, Indonesia.

(2) Mruthyanjaya Rao Mangipudi, Symbiosis International University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mihir Kumar Roy, City University, Bangladesh.

(2) R Yasodha, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mariana Simanjuntak, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mruthyanjaya Rao Mangipudi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Conservation Challenges of Two Monitor Lizards [Varanus bengalensis (Daudin, 1802) and Varanus salvator (Laurenti, 1768)] in Jorhat, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Neetu Nimesh, PDM University, India.

(2) Prashant Kumar, K.S. Saket P.G. College, India.

(3) Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archana Gupta, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, India.

(2) Rajesh Bhaurao Desai, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neetu Nimesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prashant Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA