Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Levent Son, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Prakash, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Durga Mani Gautam, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Berhanu Niguse Feyisa, Jimma University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Durga Mani Gautam, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Kumar Singh, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Ernesto A. Chávez, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Syafrialdi, Muara Bungo University, Indonesia.

(2) Suja Nagampoozhi, St Aloysius College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pradeep Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ernesto A. Chávez, México) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Belisario Dominguez-Mancera, University Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Karhale Akash Vishawanath, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Sagarika Chakraborty, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hemant Deshpande, India.

(2) Mihai Iacob Bențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (USAMVCN), Romania.

(3) Walaa hussein khalifa, National research center, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Karhale Akash Vishawanath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sagarika Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ziaul Islam, Shahed Benazir Bhutto University, UPPER SHERINGAL.

(2) Subhasish Sahu, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Jahanzaib Khaliq, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ziaul Islam, UPPER SHERINGAL) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subhasish Sahu, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jahanzaib Khaliq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jiang Wang , Peking University ShenZhen Graduate School, China.

(2) Danilo Vitor Vilhena Batista, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepa Gopinath, The Oxford College of Science, Arts, Commerce and Management, India.

(2) Faisal Tasleem, Ningbo University, China.

(3) S.Balamurugan, Govt Arts College [Autonomous], Bharathidasan University, India.

(4) Shailendar Mogdumpuram, India.

(5) Suresh babu Ch, Krishna University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jiang Wang, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Danilo Vitor Vilhena Batista, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehrdad Zamanpoore, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, Iran.

(2) Jayvardhan V Balkhande, Digambarrao Bindu ACS College, Bhokar Dist. Nanded, MS., India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cirilo O. Ybañez, Davao Oriental State University, Philippines.

(2) Seyed Ehsan Vesal, Seyed Ehsan Vesal Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Italy.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehrdad Zamanpoore, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jayvardhan V Balkhande, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Obodo Basil Nnaemeka, Purdue University, United States.

(2) Abdullah Hameed Salim, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Obodo Basil Nnaemeka, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdullah Hameed Salim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mani Bhushan, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Alishbah Mohsin, Khwaja Fareed university of engineering and.
information technology, Pakistan

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farhana Shafiq Ghory, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mani Bhushan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alishbah Mohsin, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sirigireddy Sivajothi, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anju Jain, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Abhishek Giri, SAGE University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayse Nur Aydin, Türkiye.

(2) Sushil Bera, Khejuri College, India.

(3) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anju Jain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Giri, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghulam Abbas, Riphah International University Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Teodora Popova, Institute of Animal Science-Kostinbrod, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghulam Abbas, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Teodora Popova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA