Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Biological and Ontogenic Studies of Brinjal Shoot and Fruit Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenée) under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Kareem Al-Taae, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Waluniba, Nagaland University, India.

(3) M.Ananthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) João Rufino de Freitas Filho, Rural Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Kareem Al-Taae, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Waluniba, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M.Ananthi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Trust Paradox in Green Nudges in the Indian Context: Mediating the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Interventions with Socio-Cultural Sensitivity

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, AKTU Lucknow University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Renil Septiano, Indonesia.

(2) Ranjith Somasundaran Chakkambath, Amity , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shivam Singh, IIT Delhi, India.

(2) Slavoljub Jaroslav Hilčenko, Univesity of Novi Sad, College for Vocational Education of Preschool Teachers and Coaches, Serbia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Renil Septiano, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjith Somasundaran Chakkambath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Seasonal Variation in the Proximate Composition of Mugil cephalus from the Godavari Estuary, Andhra Pradesh, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Ghaffar, Ocean University of China, Pakistan.

(2) Divya Kiran Kokani, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Kumar Singh, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Ghaffar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Divya Kiran Kokani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of FSH Stimulation on Follicular Development and Oocyte Recovery Rate Following Ovum Pick-up in Sahiwal Cows

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Agung Adi Candra, Politeknik Negeri Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) Manoj Kumar Sharma, CSKHPKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dibyendu Chakraborty, SKUAST-Jammu, India.

(2) Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, COVAS, India.

(3) Shivani Jha, ICAR National Research Centre for Makhana, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agung Adi Candra, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Peer Review History: Varietal Screening of Rose Cultivars against Sucking Pests under Field Conditions in the Kashmir Valley

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India.

(2) Alaa Sadoon Abbas, AL-Furat Al-Awset Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Ragni Devi, ANDUAT Kumarganj, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alaa Sadoon Abbas, AL-Furat Al-Awset Technical University, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ragni Devi, ANDUAT Kumarganj, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Study on Biochemical Composition of Muscle Tissue of Freshwater Fish Channa striata (Bloch) of River Kharun, Chhattisgarh, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Vardhanapu Venkata Lakshmi, Tamil Nadu Dr. J Jayalithaa Fisheries University, India.

(2) Murwanashyaka Miche, Kibogora Polytechnic, Rwanda.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vardhanapu Venkata Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Murwanashyaka Miche, Rwanda) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Zooplankton in Active and Non-active Fishing Zones of Kollam, Kerala, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Aquaculture, Atatürk University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Fereidun Mohebbi, Education and Extension Organization, Urmia, Iran.

(2) R Rajendar Kumar, MBRC, Zoological Survey of India Chennai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farhana Shafiq Ghory, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(2) Monika Dudić, State university of Novi Pazar, Serbia.

(3) Prachi Sachchidanand Hatkar, DES Pune University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fereidun Mohebbi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R Rajendar Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Poecilobdella manashiae, A New Species of Leech from Tripura, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. P. Dubey, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Saiprasad Bhusare, Dau Shri Vasudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Sagrado C. Magallanes, Romblon State University, Philippines.

(3) Naveen Kumar, anskaram University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saiprasad Bhusare, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sagrado C. Magallanes, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Naveen Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in Zoological Sciences: Applications, Advances, Challenges and Future Perspectives in Ecology, Aquaculture, Toxicology and Biodiversity Conservation

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Seun Michael Oyekunle, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

(2) Mohammed Salim Jasim AL-Taie, University of Misan, Iraq.

(3) S Rukmani Devi, SIMATS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Razzak Khan Qureshi, Medicaps University, India.

(2) N. Balakrishnan, Sona College of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seun Michael Oyekunle, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Salim Jasim AL-Taie, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S Rukmani Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Evaluation of Reversible Sepsis-induced Myocardial Depression in Dogs with Canine Parvovirus Infection through Echocardiographic and Biomarker Assessment

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Madhu Shivhare , NDVSU, India.

(2) Asmaa Yousuf Thanoon, Alnoor University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ranjith H K, Prakriya Hospitals, India.

(2) Rohit Kumar Singh, Sri Krishna Medical College, India.

(3) Vinu Choudhary, Bisu Hospital & Fertility Centre, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Madhu Shivhare, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asmaa Yousuf Thanoon, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA