Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Professor, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Medidi Srinivas, Geethanjali College of Pharmacy, Hyderabad, India.

(2) Tataringa Gabriela, UMF Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Medidi Srinivas, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tataringa Gabriela, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Professor, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mosiqur Rahman, Southeast University, Bangladesh.

(2) Samer Saleem Alshkarchy, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(3) Benjamin Valladares Carranza, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico Toluca, México.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mosiqur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samer Saleem Alshkarchy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Benjamin Valladares Carranza, México) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Harpreet Kaur Sodhi, Army College of Nursing, India.

(2) Horia Bunescu, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harpreet Kaur Sodhi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Horia Bunescu, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Yosiel Álvarez Quesada, Institute of Ecology and Systematics (IES), Cuba.

(2) Pollobi Duara, Majuli College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yosiel Álvarez Quesada, Cuba) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pollobi Duara, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Angkasa Putra, Pukyong National University, Republic of Korea.

(2) Mauro José Cavalcanti, Ecoinformatics Studio, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Angkasa Putra, Republic of Korea) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mauro José Cavalcanti, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Djebar Med Reda, Environmental Research Centre of Annaba, Algeria.

(2) Terfo Yilma Mikre, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Djebar Med Reda, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Terfo Yilma Mikre, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Arunkumar, Bharathiar University, India.

(2) Dhyal Singh, Uttaranchal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Arunkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhyal Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Clinical Biochemistry, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Azizur Rahman, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

(2) Ashish M. Kandalkar, Oriental University, India.

(3) Vinay Vishnudas Sarode, Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Wardha, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Azizur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish M. Kandalkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vinay Vishnudas Sarode, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, Associate Professor, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA And Professor, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Okoye Ogechi, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Aabsheen Saba Khanam, Agra College, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(3) Jahnavi Bandla, Vishnu Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Okoye Ogechi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aabsheen Saba Khanam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jahnavi Bandla, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Naziya P. Pathan, S. D. Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mae San Agustin Lustre, Central Bicol State University of Agriculture, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naziya P. Pathan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mae San Agustin Lustre, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA