Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tahzib Ibrahim Protik, Bangladesh.

(2) Ajit Joshi, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tahzib Ibrahim Protik, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajit Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Khamar, Mohammed V University in Rabat Morocco, Morocco.

(2) Maimom Soniya Devi, College of Horticulture, Bermiok, CAU (I), India.

(3) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Khamar, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maimom Soniya Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Jaynos R. Cortes, North Eastern Mindanao State University- Lianga Campus, Philippines.

(2) Wahyu Pamungkas, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jaynos R. Cortes, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wahyu Pamungkas, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) D Srihari S Kumar Raju, Maharajah’s Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Dasan Swaminathan, Lincoln University College, Malaysia.

(3) H Sudiyono, M.M., IKIP Siliwangi, Republic of Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D Srihari S Kumar Raju, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dasan Swaminathan, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (H Sudiyono, M.M., Republic of Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Oljira Kenea, Wollega University, Ethiopia.

(2) Ashraf Hussain, Govt. Graduate College, Muzaffargarh, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oljira Kenea, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashraf Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Fang Lizhen, Xinxiang Medical University, China.

(2) Neetika Mathur, Kanoria P G Mahila Mahavidyalaya, University of Rajasthan, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fang Lizhen, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neetika Mathur, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Richa Sharma, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences & Technology, India.

(2) Duaa Mir, Govt. College Women University Sialkot, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Richa Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Duaa Mir, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Amirsajad Jafari, Shiraz University, Iran.

(2) Naima Sahraoui, Blida 1 University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amirsajad Jafari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naima Sahraoui, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Pragya Mehta, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Pratyush Ghosh, Chandernagore College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pragya Mehta, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratyush Ghosh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Belisario Dominguez-Mancera, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University Veracruz, Mexico..

Reviewers:

(1) Chandan Kumar Panigrahi, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan , Deemed To Be University, India.

(2) Amrit Banerjee, MITS Institute of Professional Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandan Kumar Panigrahi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amrit Banerjee, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA