Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(2) Leishangthem Sarnabati Devi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Leishangthem Sarnabati Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, University of Mississipi Medical Center and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanny C. Babera, President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Philippines.

(2) Mahipatsinh B. Rajput, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Temitayo Oluyo Oluyo, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanny C. Babera, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahipatsinh B. Rajput, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Zirak M R Palani, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(2) Ellen J. Saleh, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jettaboina Sai Kiran, P.V.Narsimha Rao TelanganaVeterinary University(PVNRTVU), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zirak M R Palani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ellen J. Saleh, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jatin Kumar Singh, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Gyan Prakash Morya, Vital Biotech Research & Training Institute, India.

(3) Kanukula Akhil, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akhileshwar Vishwakarma, ICAR- National Research Centre for Makhana, India.

(2) Dwarka, JNKVV, College of  Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jatin Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gyan Prakash Morya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kanukula Akhil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mercy Julieth Artunduaga Marquez, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Biotecnología del Instituto Politécnico Nacional , Mexico.

(2) Hussein Farid Mohamed, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Krishnaveni, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, Indian.

(2) Jose Oliveira Dantas, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Sergipe, Brazil.

(3) Salisu Zainab Ibrahim, Federal University of Education, Nigeria.

(4) Shadia Mohammad Abdel-Aziz, National Research Centre Dokki, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mercy Julieth Artunduaga Marquez, Mexico ) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hussein Farid Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Levent Son, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

(2) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Preetimayee Sahoo, Sri Sri University, India.

(2) N.Karpoora Sundara Pandian, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Preetimayee Sahoo, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N.Karpoora Sundara Pandian, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State University of Sonora,  Sonora.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Ashikur Rahman, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Abhishek Giri, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

(3) Biplab Bhowmik, Diamond Harbour Women’s University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Ashikur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Giri, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Biplab Bhowmik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Sindhuja, Islamiah Women’s Arts and Science College, India.

(2) P Radhika, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdulkarim Abdulmageed Amad, Thamar university, Yemen.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Sindhuja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P Radhika, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE.

(2) Manju Hajarilal Pardeshi, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University Amravati, India.

(3) M. Kishore Kumar, Andhra Pradesh Fisheries University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Husain Latuconsina, Universitas Isalam Malang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manju Hajarilal Pardeshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. Kishore Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed ElHamahmy, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Barbara Polo-Martin, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tumelo J Thabang, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed ElHamahmy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Barbara Polo-Martin, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA