Peer Review History: Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a Model System for Diseases in Biological Studies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Anubhav Dubey, Maharana Pratap College of Pharmacy Kanpur, India.

(2) Soumik Bhattacharjee, Gupta College of Technological Sciences, India.

(3) Anju Chouhan, MohanLal Sukhadia University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Andrei Alimov, Russia.

(2) Ruby Varghese, School of Sciences, Jain Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Seema Sachin Borgave, Sangamner Nagarpalika Arts, D. J. Malpani Commerce and B.N. Sarda Science (Autonomous) College, SPPU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anubhav Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soumik Bhattacharjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anju Chouhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Dengue Virus Infection on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Sivagangai District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Chee Yik Chang, Malaysia.

(2) Moatasem Al-Salih, Al-Ayen University, Iraq.

(3) Falmata Audu Gubio, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chee Yik Chang, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moatasem Al-Salih, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Falmata Audu Gubio, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Decoding Parkinson’s Disease through Animal Models: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Roadmaps

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubham Teli, B.V.V.S Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) M. Isai, Seethalakshmi Ramaswami College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubham Teli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Isai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Population Dynamics of Butterflies from Two Selected Areas of South Goa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Yalla Poli Naidu, Govt Degree College For Men Srikakulam, India.

(2) Harsh Vishwakarma, Indian Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Halina Tkaczenko, Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Poland.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yalla Poli Naidu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harsh Vishwakarma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Monthly Variations on Physicochemical Parameters of a Freshwater Ecosystem of Kurichi Lake, Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhir V. Bhandarkar, India.

(2) MS Jangra, India.

(3) Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shashikant Ramrao Sitre, N.S.Science and Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhir V. Bhandarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (MS Jangra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence of Population Dynamics of Gram Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nanu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Somireddy Srinivasa Reddy, Agricultural College, India.

(2) R. Channakeshava, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Samba Thkumar, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Somireddy Srinivasa Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Channakeshava, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Reproductive Physiology of Male Fruit Bat Rousettus leschenaulti (Desmerest): A Conservation Effort of a Crucial Pollinator

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Guilherme Garbino, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil.

(2) Shani Kumar Bhartiy, Babasaheb Bhimaro Ambedkar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aliaksei Shpak, National Academy of Sciences, Belarus.

(2) Hossein Javanbakht, University of Guilan, Iran.

(3) Todilahy Lomeris Josiane, University of Antananarivo, Madagascar.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Guilherme Garbino, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shani Kumar Bhartiy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Osteological Variation of Caudal Skeleton of Some Barbs from Tripura

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Virendra Kumar, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, India.

(2) Sojomon Mathew, Government College Kottayam, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Virendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sojomon Mathew, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Docking in Drug Discovery: Insights Challenges and Emerging Trends

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sachin S. Chourasia, Dhote Bandhu Science College, India.

(2) B Abarna, National Institute of Siddha, India.

(3) Nishfar K, Kerala University of Health and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhars, Al-Zahrawi University College, Iraq.

(2) Mukesh Kumar Kumawat, Apeejay Stya University, India.

(3) N’guessan Deto Ursul Jean – Paul, Felix Houphouet – Boigny University, Cote d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sachin S. Chourasia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B Abarna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nishfar K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Research of Fish’s Demeanor in Hereditary and Man-made Habitat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Rabina Akther Lima, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Atul Trivedi, Swami Atmanand Govt English Medium Model College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aishwarya Sharma, College of Fisheries, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Marlon S. Alejos, Biliran Province State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rabina Akther Lima, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atul Trivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA