Peer Review History: Prevalence of Misuse and Dependence of Codeine-Containing Products among Community Members in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. D. Saravanan, IBS University, Hyderabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sagar Narendra Ande, Dr. Rajendra Gode Institute of Pharmacy, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.

(2) Ejiohuo Precious Tombari, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria.

(3) Prashant Pawar, PES Modern College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sagar Narendra Ande, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ejiohuo Precious Tombari, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prashant Pawar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Transforming Abandoned Sand Pits into Sustainable Aquaculture Ponds in Purba Medinipur, West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanuel Tetteh-Doku Mensah, Aquaculture Research and Development Centre, Ghana.

(2) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(3) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Biju Abraham, NMSM Government College Kalpetta,Wayanad, India.

(2) Muhammad Akbarurrasyid, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bagus Dwi Hari Setyono, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Biju Abraham, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Akbarurrasyid, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Pollinating Insect Diversity in Selected Areas of Pudunagaram Village, Palakkad, Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Zlata Markov Ristic, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

(2) Monalisa Paul, Shivaji College, Sri Venkateswara College, Delhi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Monalisa Paul, University School of Environment Management, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zlata Markov Ristic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monalisa Paul, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ultrasonic Mosquito Repellers as a Green Alternative to Chemical Protection: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Desy Armalina, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

(2) Parbin Iraqui, Bahona College, Dibrugarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jalil Nejati, Zahedan University of medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) T Tirupal, G.Pullaiah College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Desy Armalina, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parbin Iraqui, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Breeding Strategy of Ornamental Fish, Sword Tail (Xiphophoru shelleri) & Sawdust Molly (Poecilia sphenops) under Captive Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Gizachew Delilo, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Angkasa Putra, Pukyong National University, Republic of Korea.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gizachew Delilo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angkasa Putra, Republic of Korea) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Risk Factors for Schistosomiasis in Burutu Local Government Area, Delta State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, University of Mississipi Medical Center and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelbasit Mohammed Ibrahim Hussein, Alzaeim Alazhari University, Sudan.

(2) Agniwo Privat, Université des Sciences, Techniques et Technologies de Bamako (USTTB), Mali.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Saba Wahid A.M Khan, Mumbai University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdelbasit Mohammed Ibrahim Hussein, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agniwo Privat, Mali) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Population Ecology of Vermitechnologically Suitable Earthworm, Perionyx sansibaricus (Michaelsen) in Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. P. Dubey, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Punjab, India.

Reviewers:

(1) John Warren Reynolds, Canada.

(2) Harish Kumar T. S., D.R.M. Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (John Warren Reynolds, Canada) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harish Kumar T. S., India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Nutritional Regimes for Sustainable Weight Gain in House Crickets (Acheta domesticus) for Food Security

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mabossy-Mobouna Germain, Marien Ngouabi University, Congo.

(2) G.S. Champika Perera, Sri Lanka.

(3) Shankar Sahebrao Yelmame, Sandip Foundation’s, Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Erhan Unlu, University of Dicle, Turkey.

(2) Hanan Salah Eldin Taha, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(3) Olufunke Omogunloye-Adeoye, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment: 

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mabossy-Mobouna Germain, Congo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G.S. Champika Perera, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shankar Sahebrao Yelmame, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Evaluation of Sea Grass and Fish Meal as an Alternative Feeding Ingredient for Sustainable Aquaculture Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ganesh S Kahar, India.

(2) Abdulmalik A Oladipupo, Auburn University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ganesh S Kahar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdulmalik A Oladipupo, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Inhalation of Formalin Vapors During Gestation: Effects on Placental Integrity and Fetal Viability in Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

(2) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Aviv Firdaus, Airlangga University, Indonesia.

(2) Lolla Siddhartha, Pullareddy Institute Of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Baidaa Abdulaziz  Mohamed Salah, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Essam Eldin Abdelhady Salama, Alazhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Aviv Firdaus, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lolla Siddhartha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA