Editor(s):

(1) Dr. D. Saravanan, IBS University, Hyderabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Adepeju Nafisat Sanusi, Catholic University of America, United States.

(2) Oladiipo Oladepo, New Mexico State University, United States of America.

(3) Swati Rahul Khokale, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adepeju Nafisat Sanusi, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oladiipo Oladepo, United States of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Swati Rahul Khokale, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jasvinder Singh Sasan, SKUAST, India.

(2) Ashok Dangi, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amandeep Singh, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

(2) Bhagyalakshmi Jarsangi, NTR College of Veterinary Science, India.

(3) Mohd. Yousuf Dar, Sher-e-kashmir university of agricultural sciences and technology of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jasvinder Singh Sasan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashok Dangi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunu Raj, University of Kerala, India.

(2) Jyoti Prakash Srivastava, D.B.S.College, CSJM University, India.

(3) Issa Barakat, Lattakia University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage:  8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunu Raj, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Prakash Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Issa Barakat, Syria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarmishtha Chatterjee, India.

(2) Shankar Sahebrao Yelmame, Sandip Foundation’s, Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(3) Ioana Stanciu, University of Bucharest, Romania.

(4) Natalia Vilmosh, Medical University Plovdiv,Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Al-Zahrawi University College, Iraq.

(2) Kamlesh Kumar Bhatt, Modern Institute of Technology Dhalwala Tehri Garhwal, HNBGU (A central University), India.

(3) A.Manickam, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarmishtha Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shankar Sahebrao Yelmame, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ioana Stanciu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Natalia Vilmosh, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Rounak Choudhary, Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University, India.

(2) Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rounak Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manaswini Dehuri, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dorin Togoe, University of Agronomic Science and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Ajeet Kumar, Bihar Veterinary College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dorin Togoe, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajeet Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Avik Bhanja, Vidyasagar University, India.

(2) Sushil Bera, Khejuri College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Torruco, Mexico.

(2) Laurentiu Burlacu, Romania.

(3) Raghvendra Niranjan, Dr. Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avik Bhanja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushil Bera, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Hassoon nadhem almasoudy, Kerbala university, Iraq.

(2) Yasmeen Ali Rafi, University of Madras, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nur Amiera Kamarudin, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Praseeja Cheruparambath, Sree Narayana College Alathur, India.

(3) Vinda Manjramkar, VPM‟s B.N. Bandodkar College of Science, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hassoon nadhem almasoudy, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yasmeen Ali Rafi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Shreya Samanta, University of Burdwan, India.

(2) Parikshit Uchai, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shreya Samanta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parikshit Uchai, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Danishta, NIMS College of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, India.

(2) Kanchan Kholiya,Pt, Sanskriti University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Danishta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanchan Kholiya,Pt, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA