Peer Review History: Insect behaviour modulation using pheromones: Trends and Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Shreya Samanta, University of Burdwan, India.

(2) Parikshit Uchai, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shreya Samanta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parikshit Uchai, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Navigating Impediments to Physiotherapy Clinical Trials in India: An Analytical Discourse on Prevailing Constraints and Strategic Remediation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Danishta, NIMS College of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, India.

(2) Kanchan Kholiya,Pt, Sanskriti University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Danishta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanchan Kholiya,Pt, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Interactive response of methyl eugenol and cue lure against Bactrocera zonata (Hendel) and B. cucurbitae (Coquillett) in different host habitats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Akinkunmi, Olukemi Yetunde, National Horticultural Research Institute, Nigeria.

(2) Juan Manuel Soto Parra, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, México.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akinkunmi, Olukemi Yetunde, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juan Manuel Soto Parra, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1 (Akinkunmi, Olukemi Yetunde, Nigeria)| File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of Biopigment Production by Halophilic Bacillus sp. Using Agro-Industrial Wastes and Assessment of Its Antimicrobial Efficacy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nadiia Chernobai, Institute for Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine of the, National Academy of Sciences, Ukraine.

(2) Mohammed Naser Hussein, Afak General Hospital, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Gnanamani, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nadiia Chernobai, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Naser Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Multimodal Anesthesia using Butorphanol-Ketamine-Diazepam with and without Lumbosacral Epidural Block in Cesarean Sections in Pigs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, India.

(2) Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, University of Bahri, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Thomas Yoksa, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) Debajyoti Pal, MR College of Veterinary Sciences and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, India ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Inter Co-Relation Among Aquatic Insect Diversity to Vegetation and Physico-Chemical Parameter of Lakes on Kaas Plateau, World Natural Heritage Site, Western Ghats, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeffry M. Saro, Philippines.

(2) Mehrdad Zamanpoore, Iran.

(3) Ghooran Mahto , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ghooran Mahto, NKM College Vaishali, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeffry M. Saro, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehrdad Zamanpoore, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghooran Mahto , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diversity and abundance of Butterfly fauna (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in Vicinity of Shimla Kalibari, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhilash H.R., Yuvaraja’s College, University of Mysore, India.

(2) Sreerenjini Kamal, St John’s College,  India.

(3) Mintu Ann Varghese,Catholicate College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christopher John Zomuana Lawlor, Government Kolasib College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhilash H.R., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sreerenjini Kamal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mintu Ann Varghese, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of the Hematological and Histopathological changes induced by Cypermethrin in Anabas testudineus (Bloch, 1792)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Jasim Mohammed Al-Azawi, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Aman Kumar, Ranchi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shao-Wen Hung, Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Taiwan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Jasim Mohammed Al-Azawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aman Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gut Microbiome Profiling of Eri Silkworm (Samia ricini) through 16S rRNA and Its Impact on Silk Yield in Dimapur, Nagaland, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

(2) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjai Kumar Gupta, VBS Government Post Graduate College, India.

(2) Satadal Chakrabarti, Central Sericultural Research & Training Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjai Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satadal Chakrabarti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Study on Antibacterial Potentiality of Ruellia tuberosa and Andrographis paniculata Extracts from Medicinal Garden of St. Ann’s Campus, Visakhapatnam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, University of Mississipi Medical Center and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Beatrice Atieno Otieno, Moi University, Kenya.

(2) Efe m. Omwirhiren, Federal University College Of Education, Nigeria.

(3) P. Gridhar, SVGM Govt Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Giridhar, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, India.

(2) Somanan Liphan, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan SURIN Campus, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Beatrice Atieno Otieno, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Efe m. Omwirhiren, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Gridhar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA