Peer Review History: Indigenous Adaptive Techniques for Effective Ericulture in Kokrajhar District, BTR, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjai Kumar Gupta, VBS Government Post Graduate College, Campierganj, India.

(2) Gilberto Dinis Cozzer, Communitarian University of Chapecó Region, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Haslina, Semarang University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjai Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gilberto Dinis Cozzer, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Uniqueness of Association of Fern and Insect in the Field

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeremiah Agada, Nigeria.

(2) Prabhu Prasanna Pradhan, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil K, NSS College Ottapalam, University of Calicut, India.

(2) Ashutosh Singh, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Erdal ZENGİN, Türkiye.

(4) Hadeel Kamil Khaleel, Al-Iraqia University, Iraq.

(5) Kosisochukwu Dematus Onyeagba, University of Cincinnati, United States of America.

(6) Kumari Akanksha, Biotechnology Birla Institute of Technology, Jharkhand, India.

(7) Swapna.S, University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeremiah Agada, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prabhu Prasanna Pradhan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unusual Wingspan Records in Two Congeneric Pierid Butterfly Species Catopsilia pomona (Fabricius, 1775) and Catopsilia pyranthe (Linnaeus, 1758) from Rajgir Wildlife Sanctuary, Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE.

(2) P. Lakshmi Devi Menon, NSS College, India.

(3) Sunita Satyendra Gupta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Lakshmi Devi Menon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunita Satyendra Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Extinction to Opposition: The Double Threat Facing Zoology in Modern Society Through the Lens of Australia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, IRAQ.

Reviewers:

(1) Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Laikipia University, Kenya.

(2) Mohammed Kasso Geda, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

(3) Turcu Simona Laura, “Dinicu Golescu” Technical College, “Lower Danube” University of Galati, România.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Kasso Geda, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Turcu Simona Laura, România) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A physiological Study to Compare the Effect of Catechin and lovastatin on Obesity through Histological Examination of the liver in Albino Rats.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manal Mohammed El-Sayed Mohammed , Zagazig University, Egypt.

(2) Vinoth Kumar Ganesan, Govt General Hospital, Rangaraya Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bolisetty.Padmavathi, Chalapathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Pradeep Thorat, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Igbayilola Yusuff Dimeji, Baze University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manal Mohammed El-Sayed Mohammed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinoth Kumar Ganesan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact and Creation of Added Value of Creative Culture in Improving Organizational Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Abdelraheem Farghaly, Sohag University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mariana Simanjuntak, Indonesia.

(2) Mruthyanjaya Rao Mangipudi, Symbiosis International University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mihir Kumar Roy, City University, Bangladesh.

(2) R Yasodha, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mariana Simanjuntak, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mruthyanjaya Rao Mangipudi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Conservation Challenges of Two Monitor Lizards [Varanus bengalensis (Daudin, 1802) and Varanus salvator (Laurenti, 1768)] in Jorhat, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Neetu Nimesh, PDM University, India.

(2) Prashant Kumar, K.S. Saket P.G. College, India.

(3) Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archana Gupta, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, India.

(2) Rajesh Bhaurao Desai, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neetu Nimesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prashant Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Essential Oil Extract from Salvia leucantha in Experimental Animal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nanu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rabab Jawad Hassen AL- Hasseny, College of Food Science /AL-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Gampa VijayanKumar, Kgr Institute of Technology and Management, India.

(3) Muazzam Sheriff Maqbul, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rabab Jawad Hassen AL- Hasseny, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gampa Vijayan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muazzam Sheriff Maqbul, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Concentration-dependent Effects of CuO Nanoparticles on Survival, Biomass and Reproduction in Drawida willsi (Michaelsen)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) A V S Rajeswari, Osmania University, Arya College Of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Rayappa Shrinivas Mahale, School of Mechanical Engineering, REVA University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naveen Thakur, CPUH, India.

(2) P.Kalaivani, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

(3) Pijus Kanti Samanta, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A V S Rajeswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rayappa Shrinivas Mahale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Potential of Dietary Citric and Malic Acid Supplementation on Biological Performance and Economic Efficiency by Replacing Conventional Antibiotics in Cobb500 Broiler Chickens

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manaswini Dehuri, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Firas Mahdi Abdalroda Al-Khafaji, Al-Qasim Green University , Iraq.

(2) Manju Roy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archana, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, BASU, India.

(2) Mamta Mishra, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firas Mahdi Abdalroda Al-Khafaji, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manju Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA