Peer Review History: Population Dynamics of Butterflies from Two Selected Areas of South Goa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Yalla Poli Naidu, Govt Degree College For Men Srikakulam, India.

(2) Harsh Vishwakarma, Indian Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Halina Tkaczenko, Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Poland.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yalla Poli Naidu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harsh Vishwakarma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Monthly Variations on Physicochemical Parameters of a Freshwater Ecosystem of Kurichi Lake, Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhir V. Bhandarkar, India.

(2) MS Jangra, India.

(3) Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shashikant Ramrao Sitre, N.S.Science and Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhir V. Bhandarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (MS Jangra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence of Population Dynamics of Gram Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nanu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Somireddy Srinivasa Reddy, Agricultural College, India.

(2) R. Channakeshava, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Samba Thkumar, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Somireddy Srinivasa Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Channakeshava, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Reproductive Physiology of Male Fruit Bat Rousettus leschenaulti (Desmerest): A Conservation Effort of a Crucial Pollinator

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Guilherme Garbino, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil.

(2) Shani Kumar Bhartiy, Babasaheb Bhimaro Ambedkar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aliaksei Shpak, National Academy of Sciences, Belarus.

(2) Hossein Javanbakht, University of Guilan, Iran.

(3) Todilahy Lomeris Josiane, University of Antananarivo, Madagascar.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Guilherme Garbino, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shani Kumar Bhartiy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Osteological Variation of Caudal Skeleton of Some Barbs from Tripura

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Virendra Kumar, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, India.

(2) Sojomon Mathew, Government College Kottayam, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Virendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sojomon Mathew, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Docking in Drug Discovery: Insights Challenges and Emerging Trends

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sachin S. Chourasia, Dhote Bandhu Science College, India.

(2) B Abarna, National Institute of Siddha, India.

(3) Nishfar K, Kerala University of Health and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhars, Al-Zahrawi University College, Iraq.

(2) Mukesh Kumar Kumawat, Apeejay Stya University, India.

(3) N’guessan Deto Ursul Jean – Paul, Felix Houphouet – Boigny University, Cote d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sachin S. Chourasia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B Abarna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nishfar K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Research of Fish’s Demeanor in Hereditary and Man-made Habitat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Rabina Akther Lima, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Atul Trivedi, Swami Atmanand Govt English Medium Model College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aishwarya Sharma, College of Fisheries, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Marlon S. Alejos, Biliran Province State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rabina Akther Lima, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atul Trivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Toad Venom: A Key Component in the Drug Development with Promising Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mastewal Hailemariam, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.

(2) Valery Gunas, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Ukraine.

(3) Yogesh Pandharinath Shinde, Sanjivani Arts, Commerce and Science College, India.

(4) Uche Emmanuel Olunkwa, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(5) Annapragada Pratyusha, Hindu College of Pharmacy, India.

(6) Ayad Kareem Khan, Mustansiriyah University , Iraq.

(7) M S Kumar, Maharani’s Science College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pragati Khare, BPS Educational Institution of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Vijayshree Milind Hemke, Shri Shivaji Science And Arts College, Sant Gadge Baba

(3) Amravati University, India.

(4) Nasrullah Rastegar-Pouyani, Razi University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.07/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mastewal Hailemariam, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Valery Gunas, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yogesh Pandharinath Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Uche Emmanuel Olunkwa, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Annapragada Pratyusha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_6 (Ayad Kareem Khan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_7 (M S Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Balancing Conservation and Commercialization: A Study on the Impact of Wildlife Tourism in Biodiversity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Lokesh Tardalkar, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) Bosco Ekka, Assam University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Charles Kakuhikire Twesigye, Kyambogo University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lokesh Tardalkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bosco Ekka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unlocking Fisheries Potential in South India: Growth Dynamics, Challenges and Sustainable Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, IRAQ.

Reviewers:

(1) Seher Dirican, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

(2) Vikas Kumar Ujjania, Icae-Central Institute Of Fisheries Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seher Dirican, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vikas Kumar Ujjania, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA