Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Category Archives: Review History
Peer Review History: Enhancing Oracle Database Architecture: A Novel 4-Tier Approach for Performance and Scalability in Big Data Environments
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. D. Saravanan, Associate Professor, IBS University, Hyderabad, India.
Reviewers:
(1) Ahmed Olabisi Olajide, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.
(2) Rianat Abbas, Baylor University, United States.
(3) Sangeeta Gupta, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, India.
(4) Dorcas Folasade Oyebode, Purdue University Northwest, United States.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Abuh Ibrahim Sani, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.
(2) Asma Dhaouadi, Savoie Mont Blanc University, France.
(3) Victoria Ogunsanya, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Olabisi Olajide, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rianat Abbas, United States) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sangeeta Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dorcas Folasade Oyebode, United States) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Production of L-Asparaginase using Soil Isolate of Cladosporium sp. and Evaluation of its Antitumor and Antioxidant Activities
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.
Reviewers:
(1) Manisha Singh Dikhit, SAGE University, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
(2) Rasha Mohammed Sajet Al-Oqaili, Urmia University, Iran.
(3) G. Sangeetha Vani, Ethiraj College for Women, Chennai, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manisha Singh Dikhit, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rasha Mohammed Sajet Al-Oqaili, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (G. Sangeetha Vani, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Insect Gut Microbiota and Their Role in Cellulose Degradation: A Brief Review
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.
Reviewers:
(1) Ervie Sukma Prabawati, Sunan Bonang University, Indonesia.
(2) Kamal Fared Almokhalelati, University of Damascus, Syria.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ervie Sukma Prabawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamal Fared Almokhalelati, Syria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Natural Pesticides in Indian Agriculture Sector: A Minireview
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Reviewers:
(1) Shradha Parmar, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.
(2) Kopparthi Amrutha Valli Sindhura, ICAR-IIHR, India.
(3) Guguli Dumbadze, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Georgia.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shradha Parmar, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kopparthi Amrutha Valli Sindhura, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Guguli Dumbadze, Georgia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Effects of Platelets Rich Plasma and N Acetyl Cysteine on Achilles Tendon Regeneration in Dog
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Reviewers:
(1) Bhagyalakshmi Manjappa, Tumkur University, India.
(2) Metodi Hristov Petrichev, University of Forestry, Bulgaria.
(3) Siddharth Narayan, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Rupesh, Command Hospital Chandimandir, India.
(2) Güler Dilara Solmaz, Türkiye.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhagyalakshmi Manjappa, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Metodi Hristov Petrichev, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Siddharth Narayan, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Ecological and Reproductive Behavior in Gonads of Bufo viridis in Rajasthan, India
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Institute of Water Modelling (IWM), Bangladesh.
Reviewers:
(1) Hiteshkumar N. Parmar, Dr. Subhash University, India.
(2) Atindra Karar, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Samarendra Nath Banerjee, Rammohan College, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hiteshkumar N. Parmar, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atindra Karar, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Influence of Phyllanthus emblica Extract Fortified Mulberry Leaves on the Commercial Parameters of the Silkworm Bombyx mori. L
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Serdar Dusen, Pamukkale University, Turkey.
Reviewers:
(1) P. Asha, Ethiraj College for Women, University of Madras, India.
(2) N. Arunkumar, Kumaraguru Institute of Agriculture, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Asha, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Arunkumar, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Crop Association and Predator-Prey Relationship of Predaceous Coccinellid Beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) from Aurangabad District, Maharashtra, India
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.
Reviewers:
(1) Ishanu Mandal, JIS University, India.
(2) Mohamed Ahmed Gesraha, National Research Centre, Egypt.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Vinod Kumar Dubey, College of Agriculture, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ishanu Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamed Ahmed Gesraha, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Butterfly Diversity in Harding Park, Patna, Bihar, India: A Case Study of Urban Ecosystem
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. P. P. Dubey, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.
Reviewers:
(1) Narayan Lal Choudhary, Adarsh Mahavidhyalaya, Jai Narain Vyas University, India.
(2) Harsh Vishwakarma, Government Holkar Science College, India.
(3) Moitreyee Chakrabarty, Durgapur Government College, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Ajay Kumar, Pandit Ravishankar Tripathi Govt. college, India.
(2) H. D. C. Soysa, Sri Lanka.
(3) Mert Cakir, Süleyman Demirel University, Türkiye.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narayan Lal Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harsh Vishwakarma, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Moitreyee Chakrabarty, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA