Peer Review History: Amphibian Diversity and Morphometric Analysis in the Kadayam Region of the Tirunelveli District, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Geraud Canis Tasse Taboue, Institute of Agricultural Research for Development, Cameroon.

(2) Nilgun Kaya, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hiteshkumar Parmar, Dr. Subhash University, India.

(2) Jero Mathu A, University of Kerala, India.

(3) Marian Dara T. Tagoon, San Pedro College, Philippines.

(4) Mauro Sergio Cruz Souza Lima, Federal University of Piaui– UFPI, Amilcar Ferreira Sobral Campus, Brazil.

(5) Shahriza Bin Shahrudin, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Geraud Canis Tasse Taboue, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nilgun Kaya, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Replacing Concentrate with Mulato II and Greenleaf Desmodium (Desmodium intortum) Mixed Forages on Intake, Digestibility and Growth Performance of Farta Sheep

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hamed Mohamed Gaafar, Animal Production Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Jassim E.G. Al-Musawi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zirak M R Palani, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hamed Mohamed Gaafar, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jassim E.G. Al-Musawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Overview of Some Biological Aspects and Status of Sea Turtle Nesting along the Indian Coastline

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Slađana Gvozdenović Nikolić, Montenegro.

(2) Ouattara Aboubacar, UFR Sciences et Technologies, Alassane Ouattara University, Côte D’ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Subrata Kumar Behera, MSBU, University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Prachi Sachchidanand Hatkar, Maharaja Sayajirao University, Vadodara, Wildlife Institute of India, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Slađana Gvozdenović Nikolić, Montenegro) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ouattara Aboubacar, Côte D’ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Morphology and Topography of Portal Vein Root and Tributaries in Pig

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Asghar Mozaffari, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran.

(2) Palanisamy Sankar, Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, India.

(3) Wessam Monther Mohammed Saleh, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Asghar Mozaffari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Palanisamy Sankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Wessam Monther Mohammed Saleh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nanotechnology-based Materials for Sustainable Pest and Disease Control in Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Arvind Kumar, Sage University, India.

(2) Roshan Kumar Singh, IIT Madras, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nur Balqis binti Zamri, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arvind Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roshan Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Bee Diversity and Abundance (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) on Caesalpinia bonduc L. during the Flowering Season in the Southwestern Aravalli Region (Abu Road), Sirohi, Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, Veterinary and Animal Science Research Center (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharad Vitthal Giramkar, PDEA’s Annasaheb Magar Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) R. Azhagu Raj, St. Xaviers College, India.

(3) Abdul Haq, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Népidé Ndobadé Carine, University of Ngaoundéré, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sharad Vitthal Giramkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Azhagu Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abdul Haq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Solvent Extracts of Spirulina fusiformis against Pathogenic Bacterial Strains

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi Degree College, India.

(2) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Gaurav Dubey, Nagaland University, India.

(2) Rajdip Utane, Shri  Sant Gadge Maharaj College, RTM Nagpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) U Elaya Perumal, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gaurav Dubey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajdip Utane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marine Cyanobacteria-Assisted Metallic Nanoparticles: A Review on Anticancer Activity and Mechanism of Action

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sreemanti Banerjee, Diamond Harbour Women’s University, India.

(2) Prachi Pandey, RAMA University, India.

(3) B Raja Narender, CVM College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prakash Kumar Sahoo, Dhenkanal Autonomous College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sreemanti Banerjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prachi Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B Raja Narender, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Sreemanti Banerjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of Different Medicinal Plants Extracts as Repellency and Toxicity against Tribolium castaneum Herbst

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Institute of Water Modelling (IWM), Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Quarshie, University of Georgia, Ghana.

(2) Fatemeh Hamzavi, Higher Educational Complex of Saravan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Usman Ahmad, Pakistan.

(2) Sunil Aryal, NARC, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Quarshie, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fatemeh Hamzavi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA