Peer Review History: Antibacterial Activity of V2O5 Nanoparticles

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Kulvinder Singh, DAV College, India.

(2) Ahmed Sami Salman, Alqasim Green University, College of Science, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar Arya, Kumaun University, India.

(2) Hina Zain, University Of Cincinnati (my new designation, institute and email), USA.

(3) Jyoti Mayekar, Jai Hind College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kulvinder Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Sami Salman, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of Antimicrobial – Resistant Genes in S. aureus Isolated from Subclinical Mastitis Infected Ewes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramesh Prasad Sah, Nepal.

(2) Basima Qasim Hasan ALsaadi, Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology for Post Graduate Studies, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bahri, Sudan.

(2) Amatul Muhee, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramesh Prasad Sah, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basima Qasim Hasan ALsaadi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The First Molecular Characterization of Baltistan or Karakorum Gecko, Altiphylax stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867) from Leh, Ladakh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Brendan J. Pinto, Center for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, U.S.A.

(2) Kolangath Sujit Mathew, Taluka Mini Veterinary Polyclinic, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eugene Iryshkov, Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia.

(2) Nilgün Kaya, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Brendan J. Pinto, U.S.A.)) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kolangath Sujit Mathew, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Innovations in Insect Phototaxis Research and Its Emerging Applications in Pest Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Manasij Das, Seacom Skills University, India.

(2) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R. A. Balikai, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India.

(2) Magdy Youssef Mahmoud El-Kholy, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manasij Das, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marine Gastropod Planaxis sulcatus (Born, 1778) of Uvari Coastal Waters: A Comprehensive Study on Its Antibacterial Activity, Biochemical Composition and FTIR Spectroscopy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Parmar Jeet Navneetbhai, College of Fisheries Science, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Suday Prasad, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) M. Murali, St. Joseph University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Younis, Egypt.

(2) Mohammed Naser Hussein, Afak General Hospital, Iraq.

(3) Shobhit Shrivastava, Bansal College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Parmar Jeet Navneetbhai, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suday Prasad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. Murali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ecological Insights into the Predatory Behaviour of Condylostylus longicornis in Agricultural Fields of Madurai District, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, Professor, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Kapil, CCS HAU, India.

(2) Truong Xuan Lam, Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam  Academy of Science and Technology, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kapil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Truong Xuan Lam, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Randomized Clinical Study of Nano-Cerium Oxide and its Efficacy in Sciatic Nerve Regeneration: A Histopathological Evaluation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinícius Benatti Freire, Nove de Julho University, Brazil.

(2) Mahendra Dwivedi, Maharana Pratap School of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinícius Benatti Freire, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahendra Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Biology and Fertility Life Table of Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus Predating on Mustard Aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kaltenbach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Subhalaxmi Roy, SOADU, India.

(2) Ganga Gharty Chhetri, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subhalaxmi Roy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganga Gharty Chhetri, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Potential of Industrial Symbiosis in Emerging Clusters: A Case Study of Hassia, Syria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. D. Saravanan, Associate Professor, IBS University, Hyderabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S Debnath, The Institute of Cost and Management Accountants of India, India.

(2) Abdulazeez Khlaif Shathir Al Sajri, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Mensah, University of Professional Studies, Accra, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S Debnath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdulazeez Khlaif Shathir Al Sajri, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Global Dynamics of Bird Migration: Trends, Mechanisms and Conservation Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Ravindra Jawale, Nagpur Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, India.

(2) Shital V. Chopde, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, India.

(3) Chiranjeev Pandey , Government Digvijay Autonomous Postgraduate College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aamir Matli, India.

(2) Chiranjeev Pandey, Government Digvijay Autonomous Postgraduate College, India.

(3) Deborah Chen, USA.

(4) Nandagopal Paramesh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahesh Ravindra Jawale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shital V. Chopde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chiranjeev Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA