Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudhir Bhandarkar,RTMNU, India.

(2) Ankush Sharma, Sri Sai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Solanki, J.P.University, India.

(2) Getachew Fentaw, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

(3) Momin Heena Kausar Mohammad Shakir, G. M. Momin Women’s College, Mumbai University, India.

(4) Momin Shakir Mohammad Shahid, Ramnarain Ruia Autonomous college, India.

(5) Neetu, Patna Women’s College, Autonomous, Patna University, India.

(6) Pawan Kumar, Magadh University, India.

(7) Smriti Rawat, Gurukula Kangri (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudhir Bhandarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankush Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Polepalli Mallikarjuna Rao, Dr.NTR UHS, India.

(2) Gunji Venkateswarlu, School of Pharmacy, The Assam Kaziranga University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A.Nirmala, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Enas Abdulsahib Badi, Iraq.

(3) Marbe Alexandra Cardona, Corporación Universitaria Lasallista, Colombia.

(4) A.Nirmala, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, India.

(5) Polepalli Mallikarjuna Rao, Dr.NTR UHS Vijayawada, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Polepalli Mallikarjuna Rao, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gunji Venkateswarlu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Padmavathi, Nirmala College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Virendra Kushwaha, GSVM Medical College, India.

(3) Madiha Batool, GIGC, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S.Saradha, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, University of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

(3) Ioana Stanciu, University of Bucharest, Romania.

(4) Pauline Sharmila, Tagore College Of Nursing, India.

(5) Polepalli Mallikarjuna rao, Dr.NTR UHS Vijayawada, India.

(6) Sudhansu Ranjan Swain, Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

(7) Suticha Kittayaruksakul, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Thailand.

(8) Thitiphan Chimsook, Maejo University, Thailand.

(9) Utthapon Issara, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

(10) Vasanthakumari.A, The TamilNadu Dr.M.G.R Medical University, India.

(11) Zagrai Gavrilă, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Padmavathi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Virendra Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Madiha Batool, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shyamaladevi Babu, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, India.

(2) Radheshyam, Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Ramakrishnan, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Dammati Nalini Devi, Chalapathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shyamaladevi Babu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radheshyam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Naveen Gaurav, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, India.

(2) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahasan Ullah Khan, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Ashish Anand, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Kasturi Sarmah, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(4) Snehasish Routray, ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow, India.

(5) Tadele Shiberu Teferi, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naveen Gaurav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravi Kumar Rajak, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Himadri Sahu, Parala Maharaja Engineering College, India.

(2) Martin Zang Pam, University of Ghana Legon, Ghana, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Himadri Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Martin Zang Pam, Ghana, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Martin Zang Pam, Ghana, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Nureen Zahra, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Papagatla Poli Reddy, Nalanda College of Pharmacy, JNTUH, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nureen Zahra, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Papagatla Poli Reddy, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Clinical Biochemistry, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Wangrawa W. Dimitri, Université Norbert Zongo, Burkina Faso.

(2) Rahul Maddheshiya, IFTM University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nejib Benali, College of Engineers of Yanbu, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wangrawa W. Dimitri, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rahul Maddheshiya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sujata Roy Moulik, University of Burdwan, India.

(2) Vishnudeo Kumar, College of Veterinary Science & A. H., Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Huda rashid kareem kamoona, Al-nahrain college of medicine, Iraq.

(2) Debajyoti Pradhan, Egra Sarada Shashi Bhusan College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sujata Roy Moulik, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vishnudeo Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Mainul Haque, University O Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

(2) Vikas Kumar Ujjania, College of Fisheries, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohd Mainul Haque, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vikas Kumar Ujjania, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA