Peer Review History: Biological effects of radiograph on liver and kidney functions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ibrahim M. Hamouda, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Salman, Punjab Employees Social Security Institute, Pakistan.

(2) T. Gomathi Priyadharsini, Vivekanandha Dental College For Women, India.

(3) D.C. Ma Dolores Castaneda Antonio, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mihir Y Parmar, Krishna School of Pharmacy & Research, KPGU, India.

(2) Monica Emilia Chirila, Amethyst Radiotherapy Centre, Romania.

(3) Raju Srivastava, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium.

(4) Ugochukwu O. Maluze, University of Sydney, Australia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.07/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Salman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T. Gomathi Priyadharsini, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (D.C. Ma Dolores Castaneda Antonio, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spermatogenic and Genetic Investigations of Spodumene on the Reproductive Qualities of Male Wistar Rats (Rattus norvegicus)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Abeer El-Sayed El-Metwally, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Manar Mohammad Hasan AL-Murshidi, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akano Oyedayo Phillips, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abeer El-Sayed El-Metwally, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manar Mohammad Hasan AL-Murshidi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gonadal Biology of the Indian Native Killifish Aplocheilus lineatus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

(2) Dr.  Golam Mustafa, Center for Resource Development Studies Ltd., Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Wayan Kantun, Institute of Maritime Technology and Business, Indonesia.

(2) Nirbhay Sudhir Pimple, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suday Prasad, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wayan Kantun, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nirbhay Sudhir Pimple, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Morphological and Physiological Traits Associated with Mustard Aphid Resistance in Brassica Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo, University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Kumar Mishra, Banda University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Munawar Fazal, College of Commerce, Arts & Science, (Patliputra University), India.

(3) Jose Oliveira Dantas, Instituto de Educacao, Ciencia e Tecnologia de Sergipe, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Kumar Mishra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Munawar Fazal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jose Oliveira Dantas, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Weathered High Density Polyethylene Microplastics Induce Proximate Imbalance in the Post Larval Stages of Litopenaeus vannamei

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, IRAQ.

Reviewers:

(1) Angelica Dobre, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Sushil Bera, Khejuri College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Angelica Dobre, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sushil Bera, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Seasonal Nutrient Variability in Selected Freshwater Fish Species from Karanja Reservoir, Bidar, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatema Tuj Juhra, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

(2) Sefti Heza Dwinanti, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nandar Aye Winn, Myanmar.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatema Tuj Juhra, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sefti Heza Dwinanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Helminth Glycan: Importance in Host Immune Modulation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Bent Alhuda Hussein Neamah, Jabir ibn Hayyan University for Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

(2) Rael Jepkogei Masai, Kisii University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sachin Kumar, Constituent Govt College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bent Alhuda Hussein Neamah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rael Jepkogei Masai, Kenyay) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Anthelmintic Activity on Cestode Parasite Raillietina tetragona by Using Silver Nanoparticles of Cucurbita maxima Seeds and Punica granatum peel

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Aram Ahmad Mohammed, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.

(2) K.Rajesh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jenan Hussein Taha, Colloge of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(2) Muzher Mahdi ibraheem, Petroleum Processes Engineering College, Tikrit University, Iraq.

(3) Nelson Correa Herrera, University of Ciego de Avila, Cuba.

(4) Shirumalla Anuradha, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aram Ahmad Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K.Rajesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) in Aquaponics System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Ilman Bin Che Abdullah, Kolej Mara Kulim, Malaysia.

(2) Adyasha Sahu, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adyasha Sahu, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, India.

(2) Bhaskar Behera, Fakir Mohan University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohd Ilman Bin Che Abdullah, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adyasha Sahu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Triclosan in Endocrine and Reproductive Disruption: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) SB Sainath, Vikrama Simhapuri University, India.

(2) Mohammad Aziz, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (SB Sainath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Aziz, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA