Peer Review History: Unusual Wingspan Records in Two Congeneric Pierid Butterfly Species Catopsilia pomona (Fabricius, 1775) and Catopsilia pyranthe (Linnaeus, 1758) from Rajgir Wildlife Sanctuary, Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE.

(2) P. Lakshmi Devi Menon, NSS College, India.

(3) Sunita Satyendra Gupta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Lakshmi Devi Menon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunita Satyendra Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Extinction to Opposition: The Double Threat Facing Zoology in Modern Society Through the Lens of Australia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, IRAQ.

Reviewers:

(1) Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Laikipia University, Kenya.

(2) Mohammed Kasso Geda, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

(3) Turcu Simona Laura, “Dinicu Golescu” Technical College, “Lower Danube” University of Galati, România.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Kasso Geda, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Turcu Simona Laura, România) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A physiological Study to Compare the Effect of Catechin and lovastatin on Obesity through Histological Examination of the liver in Albino Rats.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manal Mohammed El-Sayed Mohammed , Zagazig University, Egypt.

(2) Vinoth Kumar Ganesan, Govt General Hospital, Rangaraya Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bolisetty.Padmavathi, Chalapathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Pradeep Thorat, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Igbayilola Yusuff Dimeji, Baze University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manal Mohammed El-Sayed Mohammed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinoth Kumar Ganesan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact and Creation of Added Value of Creative Culture in Improving Organizational Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Abdelraheem Farghaly, Sohag University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mariana Simanjuntak, Indonesia.

(2) Mruthyanjaya Rao Mangipudi, Symbiosis International University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mihir Kumar Roy, City University, Bangladesh.

(2) R Yasodha, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mariana Simanjuntak, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mruthyanjaya Rao Mangipudi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Conservation Challenges of Two Monitor Lizards [Varanus bengalensis (Daudin, 1802) and Varanus salvator (Laurenti, 1768)] in Jorhat, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Neetu Nimesh, PDM University, India.

(2) Prashant Kumar, K.S. Saket P.G. College, India.

(3) Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archana Gupta, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, India.

(2) Rajesh Bhaurao Desai, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neetu Nimesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prashant Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Essential Oil Extract from Salvia leucantha in Experimental Animal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nanu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rabab Jawad Hassen AL- Hasseny, College of Food Science /AL-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Gampa VijayanKumar, Kgr Institute of Technology and Management, India.

(3) Muazzam Sheriff Maqbul, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rabab Jawad Hassen AL- Hasseny, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gampa Vijayan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muazzam Sheriff Maqbul, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Concentration-dependent Effects of CuO Nanoparticles on Survival, Biomass and Reproduction in Drawida willsi (Michaelsen)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) A V S Rajeswari, Osmania University, Arya College Of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Rayappa Shrinivas Mahale, School of Mechanical Engineering, REVA University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naveen Thakur, CPUH, India.

(2) P.Kalaivani, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

(3) Pijus Kanti Samanta, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A V S Rajeswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rayappa Shrinivas Mahale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Potential of Dietary Citric and Malic Acid Supplementation on Biological Performance and Economic Efficiency by Replacing Conventional Antibiotics in Cobb500 Broiler Chickens

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manaswini Dehuri, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Firas Mahdi Abdalroda Al-Khafaji, Al-Qasim Green University , Iraq.

(2) Manju Roy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archana, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, BASU, India.

(2) Mamta Mishra, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firas Mahdi Abdalroda Al-Khafaji, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manju Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: New Record of Indian Moon Moth Actias selene (Hubner, 1807) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) from Pampoli, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Aruna Sri Issai, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Sojomon Mathew, Government College Kottayam, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit KatewaS, India.

(2) Jatishwor Singh Irungbam, Czech Republic.

(3) Nasrullah Rastegar-Pouyani, Razi University, Iran.

(4) Prakash Chand Pathania, Zoological Survey of India, India.

(5) Suruliyandi Vijayan, UAE.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aruna Sri Issai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sojomon Mathew, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Habitat Specific Assessment of Butterflies from Buxa Tiger Reserve, West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(2) Dr.  Golam Mustafa, Center for Resource Development Studies Ltd., Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Kporvie Atsu Kodjo George, University of Lomé, TOGO.

(2) Monish Kumar Thapa, The Assam Royal Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Grzegorz Kopij, Wroclaw University of Environmental & Life Sciences, Poland.

(2) Owayes M. Hamed, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kporvie Atsu Kodjo George, TOGO) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monish Kumar Thapa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA