Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Akinkunmi, Olukemi Yetunde, National Horticultural Research Institute, Nigeria.

(2) Juan Manuel Soto Parra, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, México.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akinkunmi, Olukemi Yetunde, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juan Manuel Soto Parra, México) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1 (Akinkunmi, Olukemi Yetunde, Nigeria)| File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nadiia Chernobai, Institute for Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine of the, National Academy of Sciences, Ukraine.

(2) Mohammed Naser Hussein, Afak General Hospital, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Gnanamani, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nadiia Chernobai, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Naser Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, India.

(2) Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, University of Bahri, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Thomas Yoksa, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) Debajyoti Pal, MR College of Veterinary Sciences and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, India ) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeffry M. Saro, Philippines.

(2) Mehrdad Zamanpoore, Iran.

(3) Ghooran Mahto , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ghooran Mahto, NKM College Vaishali, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeffry M. Saro, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehrdad Zamanpoore, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghooran Mahto , India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhilash H.R., Yuvaraja’s College, University of Mysore, India.

(2) Sreerenjini Kamal, St John’s College,  India.

(3) Mintu Ann Varghese,Catholicate College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christopher John Zomuana Lawlor, Government Kolasib College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhilash H.R., India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sreerenjini Kamal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mintu Ann Varghese, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Jasim Mohammed Al-Azawi, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Aman Kumar, Ranchi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shao-Wen Hung, Agricultural Technology Research Institute, Taiwan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Jasim Mohammed Al-Azawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aman Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of  Veracruz,  Mexico.

(2) Dr. Tunira Bhadauria, Feroz Gandhi P.G. Degree College, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjai Kumar Gupta, VBS Government Post Graduate College, India.

(2) Satadal Chakrabarti, Central Sericultural Research & Training Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjai Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satadal Chakrabarti, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, University of Mississipi Medical Center and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Beatrice Atieno Otieno, Moi University, Kenya.

(2) Efe m. Omwirhiren, Federal University College Of Education, Nigeria.

(3) P. Gridhar, SVGM Govt Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Giridhar, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, India.

(2) Somanan Liphan, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan SURIN Campus, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Beatrice Atieno Otieno, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Efe m. Omwirhiren, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Gridhar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjai Kumar Gupta, VBS Government Post Graduate College, Campierganj, India.

(2) Gilberto Dinis Cozzer, Communitarian University of Chapecó Region, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Haslina, Semarang University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjai Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gilberto Dinis Cozzer, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeremiah Agada, Nigeria.

(2) Prabhu Prasanna Pradhan, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil K, NSS College Ottapalam, University of Calicut, India.

(2) Ashutosh Singh, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Erdal ZENGİN, Türkiye.

(4) Hadeel Kamil Khaleel, Al-Iraqia University, Iraq.

(5) Kosisochukwu Dematus Onyeagba, University of Cincinnati, United States of America.

(6) Kumari Akanksha, Biotechnology Birla Institute of Technology, Jharkhand, India.

(7) Swapna.S, University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeremiah Agada, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prabhu Prasanna Pradhan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA